Dune, director Denis Villeneuve’s science-fiction epic with a very attractive cast, was originally scheduled to be released on November 20, 2020. But it was delayed to December 30 due to the pandemic before being pushed again to October 1, 2021 (sorry, The Batman). On Friday, Warner Bros. made one (hopefully) final tweak to the release date: Dune will now come out on October 22, the busiest day for movies this year.
The following films come out on October 22: Dune, starring Timothée Chalamet, Rebecca Ferguson, Oscar Isaac, Josh Brolin, Dave Bautista, Zendaya, and Jason Momoa; The French Dispatch, Wes Anderson’s first live-action movie in seven years; Edgar Wright’s stellar-looking Last Night in Soho with Thomasin McKenzie, Anya Taylor-Joy, and the great Diana Rigg in her final performance; and Jackass 4, which honestly might be the film I’m most looking forward to. Not only for this day, but for all of 2021.
Dune‘s new release date was originally held by Clint Eastwood’s Cry Macho, which will now come out on September 17. Meanwhile, The Sopranos prequel movie The Many Saints of Newark will take the October 1 slot. According to the Hollywood Reporter, the shuffling is due to the studio wanting to give Dune “more distance” from No Time to Die, which opens on October 8. Atreides… Paul Atreides >>> Bond… James Bond.
Big day in the world of skulls. In a potentially groundbreaking discovery published in scientistic journal, The Innovation, researchers have unveiled the “Dragon Man” skull, which may be the first evidence of a new species of humans or a link to one of our close cousins. While analysts point to the skull being more than 146,000 years old, it spent the past 90 years buried in a well in China. The skull was reportedly unearthed by a Chinese man while building a bridge during the Japanese occupation of Northern China. Fearing that his supervisors would take the treasure, he buried in it a well where it stayed for almost a century until his family turned it over to scientists. What they discovered about the “Dragon Man” skull was truly remarkable.
In three papers in the year-old journal The Innovation, paleontologist Qiang Ji of Hebei GEO University and his team call the new species Homo longi. (Long means dragon in Mandarin.) They also claim the new species belongs to the sister group of H. sapiens, and thus, an even closer relative of humans than Neanderthals. Other researchers question that idea of a new species and the team’s analysis of the human family tree. But they suspect the large skull has an equally exciting identity: They think it may be the long-sought skull of a Denisovan, an elusive human ancestor from Asia known chiefly from DNA.
While the scientific ramifications of discovering a new species of man are obviously huge, nothing beats the chance to make a bunch of Lord of the Rings jokes and remind everyone that Donkey in Shrek had sex with a dragon. So, that’s exactly what people got down to on social media in yet another sign that humanity might still have some evolving to do. Or not. Who’s to say?
It’s wild to think that a franchise that began as a maybe-homage to Point Break set in the world of street racing has spawned nine films and grown to encompass arguably at least three distinct genres.
In the beginning it was so much simpler. For that we partly have Paul Walker to thank. Director Rob Cohen and producer Neil Moritz, who had worked with Walker on The Skulls (about a corrupt fraternity) asked the butterscotch himbo what his dream project would be. Walker told the pair that he’d love to do something like “Days of Thunder meets Donnie Brasco.” The filmmakers optioned a Vibe article about street racing to that end, and the rest is history.
Well, sort of. The idea that the filmmakers behind a movie no one saw and a then-unknown leading man who seemed like an even more beautiful, more wooden-acting version of early Keanu Reeves would team up to create a multi-billion dollar franchise about souped-up Japanese cars had to seem utterly unfathomable at the time. Even now, that this franchise would carry on, and in fact get even bigger, years after its main star died doing the exact thing the movies glorify seems hard to believe. The Fast/Furious franchise has defied the odds over and over to become a cornerstone of Universal’s business 20, years on.
Furious 8 saw the gang (which almost saw Timothy Olyphant playing Dom instead of Vin Diesel) — which now curiously combines established action stars lured by huge paydays like The Rock and Jason Statham with stars-they-could-afford-at-the-time veterans like Tyrese Gibson and Ludacris — trying to outrun nuclear submarines bursting through arctic ice in a chase for the “nuclear football.” It’s funny to juxtapose that with the original story about a truckload of stolen DVDs.
Yes, you could say we’ve come a long way since “bullshit, asshole, no one likes the tuna here.”
Has the journey been a good one? Well, yes and no. On the way to nine movies there are bound to be some good ones, some bad ones, some terrible ones, and some terribly good ones. We’ve gained and lost some good cast members along the way, to obscurity, to feuds, to greater fame, or to the great beyond. But at the end of the day, as Vin Diesel would growl, they’re family.
Note: Since I wrote it last, and you’re all probably wondering how it stacks up, I’m going to put the new one, F9, at the end along with its ranking to show where it fits in with the rest of them.
8. Fast & Furious (aka The Fourth One, aka 4 Fast 4 Furious, aka Fast and 4urious, aka The One Where Letty Dies)
Universal
Year Released: 2009
Number in Franchise: 4
Director: Justin Lin
Plot: Fugitive Dominic Toretto and FBI agent Brian O’Connor team up to take down the drug lord who killed Letty.
Notable Lines: “Dom. Dom… DOMMMM!!!”
A lot of people have 2 Fast 2 Furious at the bottom of their rankings, and to be fair, that one probably is more forgettable. Yet 4 Fast 4 Furious feels distinctly like the least fun of the series. 4 Fast is the dour, war-on-terror era Fast/Furious movie, where Brian O’Connor (who was initially an LAPD cop trying to make detective, and later a fugitive ex-cop) has somehow become a full-fledged, suit-wearing fed.
Half the movie consisted of Brian and Dom running around beating up witnesses. The influence of 24, one of the defining shows of the mid-aughts, certainly shows in Fast And Furious, which was conceived in 2007 and released in 2009.
This was the first “real” sequel with Vin Diesel back after he declined to be in the second and third installments over script concerns (and yes, you can imagine how bad the scripts had to be for the guy who left to do xXx to turn them down). In terms of the greater arc of the franchise, 4 Fast 4 Furious was the awkward transitional moment, between Fast/Furious as a car-racing exploitation movie and Fast/Furious as a fabulously expensive celebration of ridiculousness and excess.
The identity crisis is easy to understand: what even was the franchise at this point? One successful buddy movie and two wildly divergent sequels with completely different casts? You can feel Fast And Furious trying to square this circle and not quite getting it right, almost from the very first scene — which sees Dom, Letty, Han, and the gang trying to hijack a gas truck in the Dominican Republic.
They do this not by, you know, just pulling in front of the truck and forcing him to pull over, or shooting out the tires, but through an incredibly complex plan that involves a harpoon gun, guiding souped-up trucks onto the trailers in reverse, and multiple people climbing around on top of a gas trailer with backpacks full of liquid nitrogen. And why do they do this, you might ask? Because, as Letty screams by way of exposition, “Gas is money, papa!”
That’s right, they’ve employed three or four incredibly souped-up custom performance automobiles and multiple death-defying stunts in service of what amounts to a complex gas-siphoning operation.
Of course, gangs with convoluted, pointless plans carried out in unnecessarily complex car operations aren’t prohibitive in Fast/Furious movies. Some of the best Fast movies are the most idiotic. 4 Fast 4 Furious‘s crime wasn’t being silly, it was being sad.
If this convoluted, idiotic plan had been the lead-up to a pool party or a family barbecue (which are as canon in this franchise as excessive gear shifts), it might’ve worked. Instead, it was a build-up to Letty’s death, itself a means for Dom to be sullen and sad for the rest of the movie.
One thing 4 Fast 4 Furiousdid do notably well was casting, getting John Ortiz for the chief villain (is anyone else so simultaneously charming and full of menace?) and future Wonder Woman Gal Godot as FBI agent “Gisele Yashar.” There’s even a seduction scene in which Gisele coquettishly asks Dom to describe his ideal woman. In response, Dom gets a faraway look on his face and describes her as “20% angel, 80% devil.”
It’s one of the dumber lines ever written, but you have to respect the symmetry of a franchise that began as a pandering attempt to cash in on car culture describing its ideal woman using a bumper sticker slogan. “Uh, yeah, she’s 20% angel, 80% devil, she always gives ass, gas, or grass because she never rides for free, and her favorite pastime is peeing on Ford logos.”
7. 2 Fast 2 Furious
Universal
Year Released: 2003
Number In Franchise: 2 (obviously)
Director: John Singleton
New Faces: Tyrese Gibson, Ludacris, Eva Mendes
Plot: Brian O’Connor is now a fugitive ex-cop doing illegal street racing in Miami. The cops offer him immunity in exchange for taking down a drug lord, which he only agrees to do if he can bring in his childhood friend, Roman.
Released two years after the original and without the participation of Vin Diesel or original director Rob Cohen, 2 Fast 2 Furious is sort of a poor man’s Miami Vice whose dubious legacy includes adding Tyrese Gibson and Ludacris to the franchise. Losing Cohen was probably a gift, not just because his movies are almost universally bad but because he was later accused of sexual abuse by both his daughter and an actress in his movies.
2 Fast 2 Furious is a mediocre movie in almost every way, adding to the mythology Brian O’Connor’s childhood best friend from Barstow, Roman, played by Tyrese Gibson. Does the Barstow upbringing explain the penchant for sleeveless cowboy shirts?
Universal
We meet Roman at a demolition derby. Later he dispatches a bad guy using a nitrous-powered ejector seat. Cole Hauser from Dazed and Confused plays the bad guy, arguably the least convincing heavy in the series.
But for all the lame elements of 2 Fast 2 Furious that didn’t survive this installment, it feels like the definitive iteration of Brian O’Connor as dopey SoCal car bro. Which feels like the most honest Brian O’Connor. Paul Walker in 2 Fast 2 Furious is a Kyle Mooney sketch in earnest. Likewise, we meet Ludacris’s character, Tej, currently the franchise’s super hacker and computer expert, while he’s judging a jet ski competition. This feels like the ideal way to introduce a Ludacris character.
My favorite piece of trivia about 2 Fast 2 Furious is that it costars Devon Aoki (as racer “Suki”), the heir to the Benihana’s restaurant fortune (and half-brother of the DJ Steve Aoki). Her father is a former Olympic wrestler, powerboat racer, and Benihana’s founder Hiroaki “Rocky” Aoki. (Oddly, Queen’s Gambit star Anya Taylor-Joy’s father was also a powerboat racer, which just goes to show, if you want your daughter to become a successful actress the best thing you can do for her is to start winning some powerboat races). He also, and this is neither here nor there, is a famous hot ballooner, part of the crew who made the first successful trans-Pacific balloon ride.
Anyway, knowing that Tyrese Gibson likes Benihana’s so much that he had a version of it built in his backyard (the now-infamous Gibsihana’s), you have to wonder whether his fascination started when he met the heir to the Benihana’s fortune on a movie set.
6. Fast & Furious 6 (aka 6 Fast 6 Furious, aka The One With The Long Runway, aka The One That Killed Han, aka The One With Gina Carano)
Universal
Year Released: 2013
Number In Franchise: 6
Director: Justin Lin
New Faces: Luke Evans, Gina Carano, Jason Statham (at the very end)
Plot: Hobbs (The Rock) offers Dom and the gang amnesty for taking down Shaw (Owen Shaw, that is, played by Luke Evans, not to be confused with Jason Statham’s Deckard Shaw). Letty shows up as a member of Shaw’s gang, which is explained through amnesia.
Generally speaking, I tend to think the best Fast/Furious movies are the ones in which they’re discovering a formula, and the worst ones are the ones in which they’re applying a formula. In 6 Fast 6 Furious, which blends almost indistinguishably in my mind with Furious 8, the filmmakers were applying the formula that they’d discovered in Fast Five. Which was that heist movie/spycraft blockbusters worked better than strictly street racing ones. Universal executives were quite explicit about this shift:
The studio honchos agreed that the next installments had to be less about street racing and about more inclusive subject matter. “We’ve heard so many people say, ‘I’ve never seen one, and I’ve never wanted to see one,’ about the Fast franchise,” Fogelson said. “So if these movies were still about street racing, there was probably a ceiling on how many people would buy tickets. We wanted to see if we could raise it out of about racing and make car driving ability just a part of the movie, like those great chases in The French Connection, The Bourne Identity, The Italian Job,” Fogelson explained. With Dodge as a partner, “Our strategy behind one of the biggest bets we’ve ever made is that the business has gone so far towards CG action every weekend, that we really believe creating a movie with real action and real cars will be amazing stuff to people excited by seeing something real.” [Deadline, 2011]
The Rock basically played The Rock: The Wrestler in this iteration, smirking cheesy one-liners (“you keep runnin’ your pie hole and you’re gonna smell an asskicking”) and throwing bad guys across rooms. He also had a sidekick played by Gina Carano. Now, I’ve loved Gina Carano going back to her MMA days, and I refuse to have an opinion on her dumb politics (if we got rid of all the dumb actors in the world we wouldn’t have many left), but one thing you rarely hear people say is “That Gina Carano sure can act!”
There’s a lot of fun, ridiculous stuff happening in 6 Fast 6 Furious, but much like Furious 8, the biggest problem with 6’s stunts isn’t that they aren’t inventive or ridiculous, it’s that they just go on way too long. The action set pieces drag on and on endlessly with no space to take a breath or appreciate them. They just become a dull drone. Which is a shame, because this is also a film that gave us shirtless Ludacris attempting to speak Spanish:
6 Fast 6 Furious is famous mainly for the exceptionally long runway at the end, upon which Dom’s gang uses their cars, along with some ropes, to keep Shaw’s cargo plane from taking off. And also for killing off Han during a post-credits scene that introduced Shaw’s brother, played by Jason Statham — a decision “fans” hated so much that they successfully campaigned to bring him back (#justiceforhan). I too think Han was an undervalued character, but that doesn’t mean studios should ever listen to the “fans.”
The best thing about Furious 6? It brought Letty back to the franchise using amnesia. Not enough movies utilizing amnesia as a plot point, I always say.
5. The Fate Of The Furious (aka F8, aka 8 Fast 8 Furious, aka The One With The Nuclear Submarines)
Universal
Year Released: 2017
Number In Franchise: 8
Director: F. Gary Gray
New Faces: Charlize Theron, Kurt Russell
Plot: Dom gets plucked off the street in Cuba by a cyberterrorist named Cipher (Charlize Theron) and coerced into a plot to retrieve an EMP device in Berlin. He goes rogue, and gets Hobbs and Shaw (The Rock and Jason Statham) sent to prison, until they’re broken out by “Mr. Nobody” (Kurt Russell) so that they can retrieve the “God’s Eye” super surveillance program. Also there’s a “nuclear football,” a Russian base in the Arctic, and some hotwired nuclear submarines.
Read that attempt at a plot synopsis again. Too much, right? Too much.
8 Fast 8 Furious was essentially an attempt to out-ridiculous the already-incredibly-ridiculous Furious 7. Yet whereas the ridiculousness of Furious 7 was mostly stunt and visual-based, 8 Fast 8 Furious just used every ridiculous plot contrivance on the action screenwriter vision board, from sexy cyberterrorists with platinum blonde hair to nuclear footballs and nameless government functionaries. It all added up mostly to a headache. Call it “ridiculousness fatigue.”
You can almost sense the director asking “why are all these characters even here?” They try to retcon Roman, who you’ll remember we met when he was competing in a demolition derby in Barstow, as some kind of A-Team munitions expert, with Ludacris as the expert computer hacker. 8 Furious basically tried to take all the goofy SoCal car bro-ness of the franchise and turn it into boilerplate action movie stuff. Zzzzz.
Much like Furious 6, Furious 8 had some great action bits — the “zombie car” scene stands out — but they just go on and on and on for an excruciatingly long time until the only thing you remember about them is being tired.
As I wrote in my initial review, 8 Fast 8 Furious was the action movie equivalent of your dad catching you smoking a cigarette and making you finish the entire carton as punishment.
4. The Fast And The Furious
Universal
Year Released: 2001
Number In Franchise: 1
Director: Rob Cohen
Notable Lines:“Yo, Einstein: take it upstairs. You can’t detail a car with the cover on it.”
“He’s got nitrous oxide in his blood and a gas tank for a brain!”
Non-Recurring Characters: Johnny Strong, Ja Rule, Chad Lindberg
I appreciate the “original” TheFast and The Furious much in the same way I appreciate Entourage: as bad art, that I hated at the time, but that is nonetheless the perfect time capsule of a terrible time.
The Fast And The Furious, adapted from the Vibe article “Racer X,” by Kenneth Li, is a mix of actually-cool things that Rob Cohen was trying to capitalize on, and Rob Cohen’s own, mostly terrible ideas about what was cool. See: Vince shredding his Zakk Wylde signature Les Paul during a raver house party:
There’s also shaky cameras and non-stop DJ scratching. 90% of the movie seems to have DJ scratching coming from somewhere, as if Crazy Town was hiding in the cupboard.
Early in the movie, there’s a heist in which Dom and Vince’s gang of souped-up Honda Civics (this was before the Mitsubishi sponsorship and the later Dodge sponsorship) — “the most off-the-hook idealized dope-ass rice rockets,” as Cohen calls them in the commentary — surround a semi-truck and shoot it with grappling hooks so they can jump in and beat up the driver. And all so they can steal some DVDs! In the director’s commentary, Rob Cohen called the scene an homage to Stagecoach, which is a perfect illustration of his peculiar thinking. “Well yes, this whole heist makes no logical sense, but you have to imagine that the cars are actually horses.”
The Fast And The Furious isn’t the best movie of the franchise, nor does it represent some halcyon age when street racing movies could just be about street racing. But it does seem to stumble ass backwards into a few good ideas simply by virtue of how hard it was pandering. The basic idea is that it’s Point Break in the world of cars. But at the end of Point Break, Johnny Utah just lets Bodhi surf off into the sunset. Utah is a “nice” Fed who still has a man-crush on Bodhi, but he’s still a Fed at the end of the day and he’s not just going to let this bank-robbing murderer get away. He ends their tragic love affair by defying his superiors and letting Bodhi kill himself surfing instead of locking him in a cage. …It’s all very romantic.
The Fast And The Furious asks, Entourage-like, what if Bodhi (in this case, Dom Toretto) actually was just a good guy deep down? And Bodhi and Johnny Utah really could just surf off into the sunset forever? As I wrote in my longwinded 15-year-retrospective in 2016:
It accidentally stumbles, Magoo-like, into a relevant idea: What if the cops weren’t the default good guys simply by virtue of being cops? What if cop morality wasn’t the default correct one? Maybe once you scrape away the decals and rap-rock and nonsensical heists and ham-fisted construction, The Fast And The Furious was the perfect, proudly multicultural, revisionist Point Break for a post-Rodney King world.
Also, the cars were horses.
3. Fast 5 (aka The One With The Bank Vaults, aka The One In Brazil)
Universal
Number In the Franchise: 5
Year Released: 2011
Director: Justin Lin
New Faces: The Rock, Elsa Pataky
Notable Lines: “This just went from Mission Impossible to Mission In-Freakin’-Sanity!”
Fast Five was the transitional movie of the franchise in so many ways — the first to feature The Rock, the first one with a budget north of $100 million, the first one longer than two hours. At $125 million it actually cost $40 million more than the previous installment. It once again brought back Mia, Dom, Brian O’Connor, Tyrese, and Ludacris. This time they even attempted to bring back Vince — he of “bullshit, asshole, no one likes the tuna here,” played by Matt Schultze — even if it didn’t stick.
Whereas the Fast movies were once a ripoff of Point Break with cars, Fast 5 transitioned to a ripoff of Ocean’s 11 with cars. Still, some things about the Fast franchise, however, remained canon:
1. Whenever someone needs to go faster, they simply shift gears. All the cars in the Fast franchise have at least 12 gears.
2. If you need a big truck to pull over, you can’t simply lay down spike strips or threaten the driver with a gun, you must use souped-up cars performing a complex driving maneuver utilizing grappling hooks.
3. Playing chicken is an advanced car driving move, and it always works even if the hero is driving a comically smaller vehicle.
4. The most important part of any heist is finding someone who can DRIVE SUPER GOOD.
Did you know you can play chicken with a bus in an Acura and make it flip over using the back of a muscle car? I really wish this scene would’ve cut to Dom, his brains splattered all over the inside of a bus that just flipped over 17 times going 70 miles per hour. “Aw crap, maybe this wasn’t such a good plan.”
To this basic set of rules, Fast 5 added Dwayne The Rock Johnson as Luke Hobbs, who in the Fast canon is a very large cop who is always sweating and usually wearing something made of neoprene. Something about The Rock’s very essence seemed to fit the Fast franchise perfectly.
Fast 5 was mostly a very stupid movie with far too many unclever Tyrese Gibson lines, but in this installment, the franchise was taking its first, important baby steps from merely stupid to gloriously stupid. As an aggressively perspiring man, I also appreciated excessive sweat being part of The Rock’s character.
The bank vault scene was easily the best stunt in any of the movies up until this point, and it basically set the tone for all the movies that would come later.
Unlike a lot of the set pieces in the sixth and eighth installments, it isn’t just one long drone of CGI bullshit. It breathes, it has peaks and valleys, and it gives you a sense of the scale involved. Silly as it is, there’s a cleverness to it and an internal logic that works in a way that a lot of the bigger set pieces from lesser Fast/Furious don’t. I still don’t love Fast 5, but I understand choosing to remember only the vault scene.
2. The Fast And The Furious: Tokyo Drift
Universal
Number In The Franchise: 3
Year Released: 2006
Director: Justin Lin
Tagline:On the other side of the world… on the wrong side of the law… a new style of racing rules the Tokyo underground.
New Faces: Sean Boswell (Lucas Black), Han Seoul-Oh (Sung Kang), Bow Wow — basically everyone.
Plot: Military brat/new kid in school Sean gets busted racing cars and gets sent to Japan, where he learns a whole new kind of racing.
I’m not trying to be a contrarian ranking Tokyo Drift so highly, I swear. It’s obviously the outlier of the series. Smack in the middle of this franchise about street racing and elaborate heists there’s Tokyo Drift, a high school drama set in Japan with none of the original stars.
I can understand thinking Tokyo Drift isn’t a “real” Fast/Furious movie, but that doesn’t make it a bad movie. In a lot of ways, it’s more interesting than a lot of them. Even the racing is more fun to watch. Objectively, drift racing is way more interesting to look at than people speeding a quarter mile down a straight road. One can only tolerate so many shots of people shifting gears and stomping pedals.
Admittedly, Lucas Black’s Alabama accent (inexplicably much thicker than either of his onscreen parents) and Bow Wow playing a guy named “Twink” are a bit much. To say nothing of a 24-year-old actor with a thick pelt of chest hair playing a high schooler.
But I’m a sucker for a fish-out-of-water drama, and simply taking the franchise somewhere new helped a lot. Tokyo Drift is kind of like the Mr. Baseball of car movies. Taking it to Japan forced Tokyo Drift to invent characters who were a little more complex and interesting than the SoCal archetypes of the original or the heist movie stock characters of the later series. Han, while still ultimately a babyface (though less so than when they brought him back later in the series) is allowed to be more morally complex than Dom Toretto ever was. Sung Kang is also arguably a better actor (and so handsome!).
1. Furious 7 (aka 7 Fast 7 Furious, aka The One With The Rock Flexing Out Of His Cast, aka The One With The CGI Paul Walker)
Universal
Number In The Franchise: 7
Year Released: 2015
Director: James Wan
New Faces: Jason Statham, Nathalie Emmanuel, Djimon Hounsou
And now we come to number one, easily my favorite of the series and the only Fast/Furious movie that I wholeheartedly love: Furious 7. James Wan took all of the goofy elements of previous installments and turned them into something resembling art. I could almost explain my love for Furious 7 solely through gifs:
Universal
Yes, Furious 7 had The Rock flexing his way out of a cast. It also had Vin Diesel smashing Letty’s tombstone with a sledgehammer (you’ll remember from previous installments that Letty was presumed dead and struggled with amnesia), The Rock choke-slamming Jason Statham through a glass coffee table, Vin Diesel killing a helicopter with a car, and Letty saving Paul Walker from falling off a cliff by having him grab onto her spoiler.
But I don’t love Furious 7 because of novelty value alone. All those memorable moments are illustrative of the way Wan, previously of Saw, Insidious, and The Conjuring, shoots his action scenes with a beginning, middle, and end, usually with a big punchline (like the cast, or the spoiler, or the choke slam).
It’s not that anything in Furious 7 is any more believable from a physics standpoint than the action in previous fast movies (he even had Dom and Brian O’Connor jump their cars from one high-rise skyscraper into another), it’s that it has timing, rhythm, and a sense of humor. His action scenes don’t turn into one long, deafening muddle like so many of the setpieces in the other movies, they have peaks and valleys and bridges, like the choruses and verses in a song. Between Furious 7 and Aquaman, I’m convinced that no one does stupid, fun, ridiculously expensive blockbusters as well as James Wan.
This was a movie so idiotic and brilliant that it had a posthumous tribute to Paul Walker with Corona product placement in the middle of it that was still so touching that it had people sobbing in the aisles.
God, what a movie. I wish every dumb blockbuster could be as good as Furious 7.
9. F9 (aka The One With John Cena, aka Magnets, How Do They Work?)
Universal
Year Released: 2021
Position in the Franchise: 9
Director: Justin Lin
New Faces: John Cena, Cardi B
Plot: Hoo boy, how long do you have? Dom discovers, partly via a Princess Leia-style hologram of Mr. Nobody, that his long-lost brother, Jakob, played by John Cena, is working for some kind of European dictator. They’re trying to get his hands on “the Aries device,” which is a thing that can hack any computer and is somehow different from the “God’s Eye” from the last movie.
Before we get into the movie, I just want to point out that Vin Diesel told Kelly Clarkson that he had a “strange feeling” that the dearly-departed Paul Walker had “sent” John Cena to play Vin’s brother in the ninth Fast/Furious movie, which is one of the more amazing statements any actor has made during any press tour. The beauty of Vin Diesel is that he can sort of stare off into the distance and growl something completely nonsensical and make it sound like ancient wisdom. “Man… sometimes I just… sometimes when I’m out there on the road… I just think about sea otters and I have to smile, you know?”
Anyway, I saved this for the end partly because I didn’t want take the shine off these rankings by telling you that the latest one sucks, but… hoo boy. As I’ve noted, some of my favorite movies of this franchise came after the shift from it being about street racing to it being about international espionage. That opinion didn’t take into account F9, which is like a Scooby Doo James Bond movie starring models and rappers and wrestlers.
Yes, a team of grown-up Mouseketeers murdering terrorists by the dozen while exchanging sanitized sitcom dialogue feels like a peculiarly American phenomenon, and it’s fairly unsettling — is it for babies or grown ups? It’s for grown ups who are babies! — but the larger implications aren’t what make F9 so boring. The stunts now seem more like a thing the filmmakers have to get done than something they’re having fun with, or something that inspires them. F9‘s big innovation is a giant magnet, which they use (and use and use) for great effect. Unlike Furious 7, however, F9‘s stunts never seem to have a beginning, middle, and end, or a memorable punchline, they’re usually just one long, confusing drone. And that’s when the characters aren’t trekking all over the world in search of some MacGuffin no one cares about.
One fun game you can play while watching F9 is trying to answer the question “where are they going and why?” For 95% of the screen time I had no Earthly idea. The gang seemingly drives their cars in endless circles while dodging drones and missile strikes. Where anyone ends up and why is fairly arbitrary. A character who was in a control room or a secret lair 25 seconds ago will suddenly show up piloting a fighter jet, as if magically transported by a little kid who cheats at GI Joes.
At this stage in the game, with Paul Walker gone and us still stuck with Tyrese Gibson, Ludacris, Jordana Brewster and the gang, what this franchise really could’ve used is some actors. Instead, F9 gives us John Cena, who is not only not an actor, but, and I’m sorry to put it this way: exceptionally unpleasant to look at. Are there people who actually enjoy looking at this man’s giant angular head? His overstuffed sausage arms look like a He-Man action figure left out in the sun. It doesn’t help that they give him an awful haircut and make him frown for the whole movie. Charlize Theron gets the awful haircut treatment too, with some kind of bleachy, Lloyd Christmas bowl cut that covers her eyebrows in front. Didn’t this franchise use to be all about eye candy? Even when it was bad it was beautiful to look at.
Now it feels like a group of people barely maintaining the pretense that this franchise is still relevant in between mentions of Dodge Chargers, Corona, and other Universal properties like the Minions. Where the characters once existed as an attempt to reflect the street racing culture they were trying to depict, they now feel more like sock puppets for zombie IP.
‘F9’ opens in theaters this weekend. Vince Mancini is on Twitter. You can access his archive of reviews here.
It’s been a hectic day or so for Scottie Pippen. After giving an interview to GQ in which he voiced some gripes with how Kevin Durant plays (namely that he doesn’t play team basketball), KD took to Twitter to offer up a response and rehashed some things from Pippen’s playing days that didn’t necessarily paint him in a positive light.
Now, Pippen and Stephen A Smith got into it a bit, although as it turns out, bourbon led to Scottie conceding he was wrong. The First Take crew discussed Durant’s comments, with Stephen A. Smith generally being in Pippen’s corner. And then, Scottie sent the following post and things popped off considerably:
This post made it to the First Take desk, which led to Stephen A damn near having a meltdown.
“Scottie Pippen, my brother, with all due respect, you done lost your damn mind,” Smith said. “You really really have.”
“Scottie Pippen, that’s one of the most ignorant comments I have ever heard come out of your mouth about the sport of basketball,” Smith said later in his rant. “That is factually erroneous, completely incorrect, false to the highest degree, and I just told you why. You need to delete that tweet … for your own credibility, because anybody that knows basketball knows that LeBron James had help when it came to his chips. That don’t make no damn sense.”
We’ll return to the desk in a moment, but first, we’ll jump forward to some more posts, with Pippen identifying the exact year he meant and Smith losing his mind because Pippen was objectively wrong.
Now, this is just an absolutely bonkers thing for Pippen to say, because as Smith noted, Kyrie Irving and Kevin Love were both on the Cavs’ title winning team. But curiously, Pippen also tweeted this:
Let’s head back to that video in which Kellerman raises the following point (emphasis mine):
“In ’07, he got the worst squad ever, basically, to the Finals,” Kellerman said. “In 2015, without Kyrie or Kevin Love, he got to a Game 6 with Dellavedova as his second-best player. LeBron is able to do more with less than anyone who ever lived.
“The gist of it is LeBron can do more with less than everyone else” Kellerman continued.
On the face of it, Kellerman is obviously wrong, but as it turns out, his interpretation was correct. Pippen eventually went onto Twitter and said that he, indeed, got his years mixed up, and meant the 2015 Cavs team in his post. The culprit: Digits, the line of bourbon Pippen is launching.
I’m too focused on the Digits launch, I got the wrong year I was thinking of 2015, you good. You’re welcome for the content https://t.co/FW5A5OLnLO
Sexy Beasts, the latest Netflix reality show to take on dating with a twist, took the internet by storm earlier in the week. This time, however, the twist seems to have upset a community of people that twist borrows from heavily: furries.
The concept of the show takes blind dating to a new level, putting its contestants in heavy makeup and prosthetics to look like various wild animals. The idea of it all is that the daters won’t know what their counterparts look like, which means they will get to know the real person inside rather than the, uh, dolphin or beaver or whatever on the outside. But those who are passionate about dressing up like animals as part of their real lives aren’t exactly thrilled about the show making light of something they’ve invested a lot of themselves into.
Slate spoke about the show with a man named Joe Strike, who has written a book about the culture and is a veteran of it himself. Strike called the show “very exploitative” of the furry community and claimed that Netflix knew it was doing just that when it made the show.
I think Netflix knows exactly what they’re doing, and Netflix knows exactly what they want. There is a very widespread awareness of furries, and a lot of it is from a negative perspective. I think that even if they don’t come out and use the F word, they are hoping that people, critics and viewers, will throw that in there just as some of those comments did on YouTube. There’s always been a “Oh, look at the weirdos” kind of thing. I think this is definitely playing into that. But this is not going to shame furries because we’re used to getting this kind of reaction, to a lot of people looking at us this way.
It’s a fascinating interview to say the least, as Strike is clearly passionate and knowledgeable about a world that many simply don’t have experience with beyond jokes. And while dating shows are silly in general, it’s a good reminder that what some find weird and unique may be another person’s everyday lifestyle. We’ll have to see just how much the show leans into the various elements at play here when it hits Netflix on July 21.
Rising pop singer-songwriter Fletcher is back with an aqueous new video for her new song, “Healing.” “Healing” is Fletcher’s first single since her bouncy 2020 hit, “Bitter.”
The pensive, heart-strong ballad follows her EP, The S(ex) Tapes. On the new song, Fletcher sings in soft, mantra-like lines — “Breaking down don’t mean I’m broken / Losing hope don’t mean I’m hopeless” — as her face wafts and morphs as if we’re watching her reflection in a pool.
“Healing” was co-written with Scott Harris (known for his work with Shawn Mendes and Khalid) and Aldae (Justin Bieber, Kid Laroi) — two heavy-hitters in the introspective mega-ballad game. But, according to the Jersey Shore native, “Healing” is much more than a song title. For her, it signifies a whole new way of being. After years of self-negativity, Fletcher is invoking her “era of healing.”
“I’ve spent my whole life looking for answers on how to be better — emotionally, physically, mentally, spiritually, intellectually,” Fletcher said in a statement. “I thought, ‘If I can just figure out the secret, all my problems will be solved.’ Between different relationships, doctors, healers, crystals, self-help books, medications, podcasts, you name it, I sought it out. All my value was placed externally. And though those things have guided me on my journey and led me to where I am now, the thing I was missing was right in front of me. My own strength and love and soul have always been there, but I couldn’t see that.”
Tucker Carlson might be in the doghouse over at Fox News after a New York Times report claimed he’s been consistently leaking information to the “mainstream media,” and it appears that no one is more disappointed than Mark Levin.
Levin, who hosts his own show on the network, used his platform to drag Carlson for betraying the trust and position of power he has at Fox News. Though Levin didn’t specifically name Carlson, the intended target of his tirade was pretty clear.
“I’ve been in this business almost 20 years. I worked in the Reagan administration for 8 years. I never once, not once leaked anything to a newspaper or media outlet, ever — let alone the New York Times and their ilk. Certainly not about the people around me,” Levin said on his radio show (via Media Matters) on Thursday. “That is a serious misunderstanding of one’s role, of loyalty, and character. Let me leave it at that.”
New York Times columnist Ben Smith had confirmed with 16 journalists that Carlson had been their anonymous source for stories about the network and former President Donald Trump, even though Carlson has built his brand on spreading mistrust and contempt for the media. Though some of his friends and Fox News colleagues — Sean Hannity and conservative writer Thomas Lifson — have defended Carlson and condemned the NYT, Levin chose a different approach.
“I would tell my friend Thomas Lifson, we know journalists, so many of them, are unethical. That’s the point. We know that they’ll only keep confidences that they want to keep or keep people anonymous that they want to keep anonymous. We know this, that’s the point, so don’t be surprised when they don’t,” Levin said, referencing Lifson’s recent takedown that tried to shift blame from Carson to the NYT for outing its sources. “I used to be approached by the likes of Brian Stelter, Oliver Darcy at CNN. I never sat down with them, never leaked anything to them. You see, this isn’t a game to me. I’m not positioning myself. This is deadly serious, this is the real world matters here. The real-world matters here. It’s hard enough to be a conservative on radio and TV, it’s hard enough to be a conservative at a newspaper without people leaking against you.”
This drama at Fox News will make people happy to grab the popcorn.
A few years ago, our family took a two-week road trip through the Pacific Northwest. We visited six state parks and four national parks, camped under the Redwoods, frolicked in the Pacific Ocean, hiked through breathtaking scenery, and ate and laughed with friends and family who traveled with us.
Perusing the photos from that vacation (or “family trip” to be more accurate, per M. Blazoned’s brilliant analysis), I see gorgeous vistas and genuine smiles, children playing and families picnicking, magical moments of beauty and bliss.
But photos never show the whole picture, do they? This is a problem in the social media age as studies suggest that constantly seeing people’s “highlight reels” on Facebook and Instagram can lead to sadness and/or jealousy. Apparently, scrolling through photos of our friends basking on beautiful beaches while we’re waging whining wars with our wee ones can make us feel all icky inside. Go figure.
Since I don’t like the thought of people feeling icky inside, I thought it might be helpful to share what you don’t see in our fun family vacation photos:
What you see: A group of happy kids peering down the empty center of an ancient Redwood tree. So cool.
What you don’t see: One of my kids stomping away angrily because I wouldn’t let her slide down the hollow after her much older friend (and Boy Scout) did it first and found it to be too treacherous. (The slope was much longer and steeper than it looks in the photo.)
What you see: My sweet, happy boy on the banks of a swimming hole in Yosemite National Park gazing lovingly at his mother.
What you don’t see: Me carrying this unhappy boy away from said swimming hole while he threw an enormous fit because it was time to go and we couldn’t find the “perfect hiking stick” he had found on the way there. Someone actually slow clapped as I escorted him away. Good times.
What you see: Our big group of family and friends walking into the woods for a lovely picnic lunch under the amazing granite formations of Yosemite.
What you don’t see: We had just driven three cars full of hungry, cranky children in circles for 20 minutes trying to find a parking space near the visitor’s center, to no avail. (Fair warning: Yosemite Valley is NUTS in August.)
What you see: Our little nature lover demonstrating how big the sugar pine cone she found was at our campsite.
What you don’t see: The teeth-gnashing negotiations that ensued when I said she couldn’t bring the sap-dripping pine cone home with her because it was unbelievably sticky and also against park rules. Taking this photo was her consolation prize.
What you see: Six happy kids in a hammock at the campground in Lassen Volcanic National Park.
What you don’t see: Four not-so-happy parents telling kids for the 127th time to stop throwing dirt, stop yelling and screeching (sorry, fellow campers), and stop playing in the fire.
What you see: A gorgeous view of Crater Lake’s incomparably blue waters from the Phantom Ship overlook.
What you don’t see: Me spending the entire 1/2-mile hike to this overlook dealing with a six-year-old melting down because I wouldn’t let him get a Swiss Army knife. (Man, traveling can be tough on the six-year-olds.)
What you see: Kids enjoying beautiful Plaikni Falls in Crater Lake National Park.
What you don’t see: Every one of those kids revolting over the 1.3 mile hike to get there because (and I quote) “We’ve already seeeeen enough beautiful sceneryyyyy!” Wah. Wah. Wah.
What you see: Our three loving children bonding over the beautiful sunset view at Crater Lake.
What you don’t see: Me working through one child’s emotional crisis in the car ten minutes before this moment, and two children fighting so badly ten minutes after this moment that I made them sit in the car together at the campground until they hugged and made up.
We love to travel as a family and our kids are generally great, but they’re kids. And parenting doesn’t stop when you’re on vacation, alas.
It’s not that these photos don’t show an accurate picture of reality. These were real, honest, lovely snippets in time filled with joy and wonder. But it’s also reality that they were bookended with not-so-lovely moments. Such is life. Especially with children, God love ’em.
So don’t be jealous of people’s idyllic family vacation photos. I guarantee their trips have as much normal family drama as yours do, even if their photos don’t show it.
And why would they? We take pictures because we want to remember the good times, not the annoying ones. And over time, the whining, arguing, and complaining that come with traveling all melt away, and what we’re left with is the beautiful memories we’ve chosen to capture and hold onto.
We just need to remember that when we’re looking at someone else’s highlight reel, we’re definitely not seeing the whole picture.
Willow’s transition to pop-punk has proven to be a successful one so far. Her Travis Barker-featuring single “Transparent Soul” was well-received, and now there’s plenty more where that came from: Today, she has announced a new album titled Lately I Feel Everything, which is set for release on July 16. In addition to the Barker collab, Avril Lavigne is also set to appear on the album.
She also shared a new single today, “Lipstick.” As opposed its upbeat predecessor, “Lipstick” is more of a patiently paced but still-thumping number. In a new video for the song, she uses her lipstick and eye shadow as a green screen so images of nature are displayed on her face as she belts out the track.
Press materials note that she began work on the album during the pandemic last year by recording demos at home before re-recording them at a studio when it was safe to do so. Willow says of the album, “I just wanted to let loose with this album. I wanted to have fun and be young and not be so existential and worrying all the time. […] I thought this was a really dope outlet for a new energy I wanted to bring to my music.”
Watch the “Lipstick” video above.
Lately I Feel Everything is out 7/16 via MSFTSMusic/Roc Nation. Pre-order it here.
Now that Coi Leray has featured on the 2021 XXL Freshman class, she’s got more eyes on her than ever. She makes an effort to satisfy the demand for a follow-up hit to her breakout “No More Parties” with her new single, “At The Top,” courtesy of a beat by hitmaking producer Mustard and fellow Freshman honoree Kodak Black.
Featuring a bright, uptempo beat, “At The Top” finds Coi Leray enjoying her newfound fame while reminding listeners that the only thing that’s changed is the number in her bank account. She uses a variety of flows from the lilting melody of the hook to a Playboi Carti-esque, clipped cadence at the beginning of her verse. Kodak, who was recently sentenced to probation in his 2016 sexual assault case, provides a boastful verse to bring the back end of the song home, bragging that he’s “eating branzino fish.”
Coi’s big year has also included a few feature verses as her contemporaries employed her to add her infectious charm to the remix of “Options” by Earthgang and Wale and to DDG’s “Impatient.”
Listen to Coi Leray’s “At The Top” featuring Kodak Black and Mustard above.
Kodak Black is a Warner Music artist. Uproxx is an independent subsidiary of Warner Music Group.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.