Loki Season 2 dropped its second episode, “Breaking Brad,” on Thursday night, and Loki fans are already caught up in their feels over watching Tom Hiddleston and Owen Wilson together again.
After solving Loki’s time-slipping issue in the Season 2 premiere, Loki and Mobius are finally partnered up again as they search for Sylvie (Sophia Di Martino) in 1977 London. Not only do the two slip right back into their buddy cop routine, but their chemistry is off the charts as they cross paths with X-5 (Rafael Casal). After catching the rogue hunter, he rattles both Loki and Mobius during an interrogation attempt, which leads to a tender moment of the two bonding over pie.
While each enjoy a slice of shockingly green key lime pie (which, weirdly, is the only thing the cafeteria served), Loki comforts Mobius and assures him that everyone loses their cool. The two actors beautifully sell the scene, and it’s one of the most compelling Marvel moments in years. There was no green screen or special effects, just two actors doing great character work.
Later in the episode, Loki and Mobius fail to stop Dox (Kate Dickie) from bombing branches of the timeline, which causes a catastrophic loss of live across realities. As the gravity of the situation sets in, Loki places his hands on Mobius’ shoulder, and Loki fans lost their minds.
Hiddleston and Wilson have chemistry for days, and Season 2 is doing a great job of leaning into it. You can see from the reactions below that Loki fans can’t get enough of them together:
Loki asking Mobius if he wants to get pie… like hey c’mon let’s do one of your favorite things so you can calm down and we can have a chat about this… he knows him so well and he’s so PATIENT with him I can’t do this you guys pic.twitter.com/VPoKglMmUA
oh this shot??? loki comforting mobius who’s clearly distraught after they failed to save the timelines???? loki touching mobius???? LOKI COMING BACK TO MOBIUS AFTER SYLVIE LEFT HIM??? LOKI REALIZING IT’S MOBIUS WHO’S ALWAYS BY HIS SIDE???? ooooooh pic.twitter.com/NV5tHspUO6
Loki Season 2 dropped its second episode, “Breaking Brad,” on Thursday night, and Loki fans are already caught up in their feels over watching Tom Hiddleston and Owen Wilson together again.
After solving Loki’s time-slipping issue in the Season 2 premiere, Loki and Mobius are finally partnered up again as they search for Sylvie (Sophia Di Martino) in 1977 London. Not only do the two slip right back into their buddy cop routine, but their chemistry is off the charts as they cross paths with X-5 (Rafael Casal). After catching the rogue hunter, he rattles both Loki and Mobius during an interrogation attempt, which leads to a tender moment of the two bonding over pie.
While each enjoy a slice of shockingly green key lime pie (which, weirdly, is the only thing the cafeteria served), Loki comforts Mobius and assures him that everyone loses their cool. The two actors beautifully sell the scene, and it’s one of the most compelling Marvel moments in years. There was no green screen or special effects, just two actors doing great character work.
Later in the episode, Loki and Mobius fail to stop Dox (Kate Dickie) from bombing branches of the timeline, which causes a catastrophic loss of live across realities. As the gravity of the situation sets in, Loki places his hands on Mobius’ shoulder, and Loki fans lost their minds.
Hiddleston and Wilson have chemistry for days, and Season 2 is doing a great job of leaning into it. You can see from the reactions below that Loki fans can’t get enough of them together:
Loki asking Mobius if he wants to get pie… like hey c’mon let’s do one of your favorite things so you can calm down and we can have a chat about this… he knows him so well and he’s so PATIENT with him I can’t do this you guys pic.twitter.com/VPoKglMmUA
oh this shot??? loki comforting mobius who’s clearly distraught after they failed to save the timelines???? loki touching mobius???? LOKI COMING BACK TO MOBIUS AFTER SYLVIE LEFT HIM??? LOKI REALIZING IT’S MOBIUS WHO’S ALWAYS BY HIS SIDE???? ooooooh pic.twitter.com/NV5tHspUO6
Could Megan Thee Stallion’s industry issue be over? For years, the “Savage” rapper has been tied up in a legal battle with her former label, 1501 Certified Entertainment, and company head Carl Crawford. In past court documents, the Grammy Award-winning musician has accused the entity of sabotaging her past releases and hiding money. Now that Megan has officially returned from her hiatus, she’s shared a significant update with fans.
Yesterday (October 12), during an Instagram Live session, Megan revealed that she’s not signed to a label and explained why she’ll stay independent. The broadcast, which longtime producer Lil JuMade It hosted, gave fans hope that things were looking up.
“Hotties! The real hotties, not the notties. Kinda them, too. This part of my album is very much so funded by Megan Thee Stallion because we’re trying to get off… Y’all know what’s the tea. But I have no label right now,” said the recording artist.
She continued, “And we’re doing everything funded straight out of Megan Thee Stallion’s pockets. So, the budget is coming from me. Motherf*cking Hot Girl Productions! The next sh*t y’all about to see is all straight from Megan Thee Stallion’s brain and Megan Thee Stallion’s wallet. We are in my pockets, hotties, so let’s do our big one.”
Megan discussed the decision to step out on her own and what the future holds. “I’m so excited to be doing something for the first time independently since it was just me and my momma. So excited. It’s really just me this go around until we sign to a new label. But I don’t want to sign to a new label right now because I just want to do it myself,” she remarked.
Watch the full clip below.
| Megan Thee Stallion gives more insight into her upcoming album; says she’s funding it herself while trying to get out of her previous deal.
“I have no label right now, we’re doing everything funded straight out of Megan Thee Stallion’s pocket.” pic.twitter.com/lLqd1cL8bA
Could Megan Thee Stallion’s industry issue be over? For years, the “Savage” rapper has been tied up in a legal battle with her former label, 1501 Certified Entertainment, and company head Carl Crawford. In past court documents, the Grammy Award-winning musician has accused the entity of sabotaging her past releases and hiding money. Now that Megan has officially returned from her hiatus, she’s shared a significant update with fans.
Yesterday (October 12), during an Instagram Live session, Megan revealed that she’s not signed to a label and explained why she’ll stay independent. The broadcast, which longtime producer Lil JuMade It hosted, gave fans hope that things were looking up.
“Hotties! The real hotties, not the notties. Kinda them, too. This part of my album is very much so funded by Megan Thee Stallion because we’re trying to get off… Y’all know what’s the tea. But I have no label right now,” said the recording artist.
She continued, “And we’re doing everything funded straight out of Megan Thee Stallion’s pockets. So, the budget is coming from me. Motherf*cking Hot Girl Productions! The next sh*t y’all about to see is all straight from Megan Thee Stallion’s brain and Megan Thee Stallion’s wallet. We are in my pockets, hotties, so let’s do our big one.”
Megan discussed the decision to step out on her own and what the future holds. “I’m so excited to be doing something for the first time independently since it was just me and my momma. So excited. It’s really just me this go around until we sign to a new label. But I don’t want to sign to a new label right now because I just want to do it myself,” she remarked.
Watch the full clip below.
| Megan Thee Stallion gives more insight into her upcoming album; says she’s funding it herself while trying to get out of her previous deal.
“I have no label right now, we’re doing everything funded straight out of Megan Thee Stallion’s pocket.” pic.twitter.com/lLqd1cL8bA
The critics are right, the new Frasier feels inorganic, inauthentic, charmless, and without heart or edge. But I can’t really blame anyone for trying to make this work. In a world where everything gets recycled, of course Frasier Crane, the most successfully repurposed character of all time, deserved a shot at pulling off an impossible TV comedy trifecta following Cheers and the original Frasier. But on a solo mission, this thing was snake-bit from the start, something that’s made crystal clear when you watch or think back to the original’s pilot from 1993 and it’s near perfection.
Honestly, when it became clear that David Hyde Pierce wouldn’t return, that might have been the moment to abandon hope. Frasier isn’t iconic because of Frasier Crane alone. Grammer’s neurotic radio shrink is like the original show’s 5th best character (he’s ahead of Bulldog and Eddie the Jack Russell Terrier). But the interplay between all of them was the secret sauce from the start.
The death of the great John Mahoney created a gap that could never be filled on this show, and without him playing Martin, without David Hyde Pierce’s Niles, without Jane Leaves’ Daphne, and Peri Gilpin’s Roz, the new Frasier became a blank page. And after watching its first two episodes, it still feels that way.
The new characters – Frasier’s previously semi-abandoned son Freddy (Jack Cutmore-Scott), his roommate Eve (Jess Salgueiro), Niles’ son David (Anders Keith), and Frasier’s freshly introduced old friend (Nicholas Lyndhurst) and new co-worker (Toks Olagundoye) – are front and center, of course, but the blame for them not standing out early and often isn’t really theirs. Talented though they may be, they’re all playing characters that feel stock when compared to the originals, who from the start, possessed a slow burn allure that made you want to see how these relationships would develop.
While legendary TV director and Frasier alum James Burrows filmed the pilot (and other episodes), nearly none of the show’s credited writers (including its creators) worked on the original. The two decades of space make that detail unsurprising, but the tone of this show just feels very divorced from the original, even when they’re trying to hit us over the head with non-subtle nods. To be honest, even Grammer feels off the mark, as though he’s doing an impression of this character he played for about two decades, about two decades ago. (A detail that should also provide him some kind of shield. It’s been a long time!)
Listen, I know it’s unfair to directly compare the pilots for the original Frasier and this. Especially since the circumstances of each show and the space from when the audience last experienced Frasier Crane differs so much, but it’s inevitable and it’s extra damning.
In 1993, Frasier began with a wall of exposition as our hero lays out how his life fell apart in Boston and how he had made a choice to start anew. It’s concise, but more importantly, it’s inspiring and sets a tone where we’re rooting for this guy even though he can be a pretentious prick. It’s also grinningly funny when it turns out Frasier has been talking to thin air. In this new thing, our re-introduction is just as quick but hollow.
Spoiler, I guess, but Frasier quit his job, the relationship with Charlotte that he pursued at the end of the original series finale went 20 years before ending with little explanation (to us), and now he’s in Boston after Martin’s funeral to see some friends (no, not friends from Cheers) and Freddy before going off to Paris. There’s no real emotion behind any of this. It’s all matter-of-fact or surface. Not inspirational. And while a heartstring gets plucked by the fact that he wants to reconnect with his son, original Frasier fans will probably remember that Frasier was a bad dad who moved across the country when Freddy was a boy, and that the kid only appeared in 8 episodes across 11 seasons. (And hey, why did we need a Freddy re-cast? Trevor Einhorn is still acting.)
I’m not sure what this new Frasier misses most (besides its cast, writers, and Trevor Einhorn): it’s heart or its edge? Niles and Frasier’s sibling rivalry was delicious, but also complex. Evident in their first meeting and throughout the series, there was ample affection, but also a bouquet of petty jealousies and grievances. Martin’s live-in caregiver Daphne sort of just freaked Frasier out at the start with her psychic tendencies and absence of filter. Even Eddie the dog existed as a little tension monster, sitting on Frasier’s furniture and invading his home life. At work, Frasier’s no-bullshit producer Roz took great joy in taking the piss out of him. (It’s noteworthy how frequently the original focused on knocking Frasier down and how many times people — particularly other academics and students — fawn over him in this new show, which isn’t without takedowns, they’re just fewer and further between.)
The engine of the show, however, was Martin and Frasier’s relationship. The complexity of their situation was instantly obvious with their frayed bond and years of estrangement and uneasiness between them. And I mean instantly, through antagonism and frustration that’s both pregnant and expressed.
There is a scene in the original pilot that really differentiates these two shows. Frasier is sitting alone in his immaculately curated apartment playing piano before the doorbell chimes and he misses a key. He rises to answer the door and greet his father, whom he has begrudgingly agreed to let live with him. From that missed key to the varying looks of reluctance, sadness, ultimate resignation, and the mask of fake enthusiasm Frasier throws on once he opens the door, this is a comedy master class. A message delivered: creatively, meaningfully, and wordlessly about their very uncomfortable relationship and uneasy living situation.
With this show, Frasier is the interloper, but the edge is softened with humor that’s more broad and less intimate and pointed. Characters seem to say things, not because it makes sense for their characters, but because it fits a standard of what a sitcom should deliver. Emotional moments are outsized and quickly resolved, allowing things to move to the next set-up/punchline/EMPHATIC LAUGH TRACK even though those resolutions seem too quick or unearned.
As an example: Frasier comes off as unhinged when, after a heart-to-heart with his son, he overreacts and buys the building he lives in, flipping the power dynamic of the original with Frasier now able to force people to live with and around him on his terms rather than be put upon. Basically, it’s a horror comedy. And the second episode is no better, retracing familiar themes and moments from the original, but again, sped up. Always sped up. Frasier therapizes himself and Freddy and Frasier find common ground in their new apartment in record time. I’m not sure what emotional speed run will come next, but this show is living like it doesn’t expect to be around long. Like Daphne Moon, it might be a little bit psychic.
Getty Image
As an aside, we actually were psychic ourselves 5 years ago when we ran a list of suggested reboot ideas: the Frasier and Freddy reconciliation, moving back to Boston, Lilith popping up (at some point this season), Paris… it’s just a damn shame they didn’t go with the all-denim idea or post-apocalyptic Frasier. Trevor Einhorn would have looked badass with an eye patch! Scrambled eggs all over their face, I suppose.
The critics are right, the new Frasier feels inorganic, inauthentic, charmless, and without heart or edge. But I can’t really blame anyone for trying to make this work. In a world where everything gets recycled, of course Frasier Crane, the most successfully repurposed character of all time, deserved a shot at pulling off an impossible TV comedy trifecta following Cheers and the original Frasier. But on a solo mission, this thing was snake-bit from the start, something that’s made crystal clear when you watch or think back to the original’s pilot from 1993 and it’s near perfection.
Honestly, when it became clear that David Hyde Pierce wouldn’t return, that might have been the moment to abandon hope. Frasier isn’t iconic because of Frasier Crane alone. Grammer’s neurotic radio shrink is like the original show’s 5th best character (he’s ahead of Bulldog and Eddie the Jack Russell Terrier). But the interplay between all of them was the secret sauce from the start.
The death of the great John Mahoney created a gap that could never be filled on this show, and without him playing Martin, without David Hyde Pierce’s Niles, without Jane Leaves’ Daphne, and Peri Gilpin’s Roz, the new Frasier became a blank page. And after watching its first two episodes, it still feels that way.
The new characters – Frasier’s previously semi-abandoned son Freddy (Jack Cutmore-Scott), his roommate Eve (Jess Salgueiro), Niles’ son David (Anders Keith), and Frasier’s freshly introduced old friend (Nicholas Lyndhurst) and new co-worker (Toks Olagundoye) – are front and center, of course, but the blame for them not standing out early and often isn’t really theirs. Talented though they may be, they’re all playing characters that feel stock when compared to the originals, who from the start, possessed a slow burn allure that made you want to see how these relationships would develop.
While legendary TV director and Frasier alum James Burrows filmed the pilot (and other episodes), nearly none of the show’s credited writers (including its creators) worked on the original. The two decades of space make that detail unsurprising, but the tone of this show just feels very divorced from the original, even when they’re trying to hit us over the head with non-subtle nods. To be honest, even Grammer feels off the mark, as though he’s doing an impression of this character he played for about two decades, about two decades ago. (A detail that should also provide him some kind of shield. It’s been a long time!)
Listen, I know it’s unfair to directly compare the pilots for the original Frasier and this. Especially since the circumstances of each show and the space from when the audience last experienced Frasier Crane differs so much, but it’s inevitable and it’s extra damning.
In 1993, Frasier began with a wall of exposition as our hero lays out how his life fell apart in Boston and how he had made a choice to start anew. It’s concise, but more importantly, it’s inspiring and sets a tone where we’re rooting for this guy even though he can be a pretentious prick. It’s also grinningly funny when it turns out Frasier has been talking to thin air. In this new thing, our re-introduction is just as quick but hollow.
Spoiler, I guess, but Frasier quit his job, the relationship with Charlotte that he pursued at the end of the original series finale went 20 years before ending with little explanation (to us), and now he’s in Boston after Martin’s funeral to see some friends (no, not friends from Cheers) and Freddy before going off to Paris. There’s no real emotion behind any of this. It’s all matter-of-fact or surface. Not inspirational. And while a heartstring gets plucked by the fact that he wants to reconnect with his son, original Frasier fans will probably remember that Frasier was a bad dad who moved across the country when Freddy was a boy, and that the kid only appeared in 8 episodes across 11 seasons. (And hey, why did we need a Freddy re-cast? Trevor Einhorn is still acting.)
I’m not sure what this new Frasier misses most (besides its cast, writers, and Trevor Einhorn): it’s heart or its edge? Niles and Frasier’s sibling rivalry was delicious, but also complex. Evident in their first meeting and throughout the series, there was ample affection, but also a bouquet of petty jealousies and grievances. Martin’s live-in caregiver Daphne sort of just freaked Frasier out at the start with her psychic tendencies and absence of filter. Even Eddie the dog existed as a little tension monster, sitting on Frasier’s furniture and invading his home life. At work, Frasier’s no-bullshit producer Roz took great joy in taking the piss out of him. (It’s noteworthy how frequently the original focused on knocking Frasier down and how many times people — particularly other academics and students — fawn over him in this new show, which isn’t without takedowns, they’re just fewer and further between.)
The engine of the show, however, was Martin and Frasier’s relationship. The complexity of their situation was instantly obvious with their frayed bond and years of estrangement and uneasiness between them. And I mean instantly, through antagonism and frustration that’s both pregnant and expressed.
There is a scene in the original pilot that really differentiates these two shows. Frasier is sitting alone in his immaculately curated apartment playing piano before the doorbell chimes and he misses a key. He rises to answer the door and greet his father, whom he has begrudgingly agreed to let live with him. From that missed key to the varying looks of reluctance, sadness, ultimate resignation, and the mask of fake enthusiasm Frasier throws on once he opens the door, this is a comedy master class. A message delivered: creatively, meaningfully, and wordlessly about their very uncomfortable relationship and uneasy living situation.
With this show, Frasier is the interloper, but the edge is softened with humor that’s more broad and less intimate and pointed. Characters seem to say things, not because it makes sense for their characters, but because it fits a standard of what a sitcom should deliver. Emotional moments are outsized and quickly resolved, allowing things to move to the next set-up/punchline/EMPHATIC LAUGH TRACK even though those resolutions seem too quick or unearned.
As an example: Frasier comes off as unhinged when, after a heart-to-heart with his son, he overreacts and buys the building he lives in, flipping the power dynamic of the original with Frasier now able to force people to live with and around him on his terms rather than be put upon. Basically, it’s a horror comedy. And the second episode is no better, retracing familiar themes and moments from the original, but again, sped up. Always sped up. Frasier therapizes himself and Freddy and Frasier find common ground in their new apartment in record time. I’m not sure what emotional speed run will come next, but this show is living like it doesn’t expect to be around long. Like Daphne Moon, it might be a little bit psychic.
Getty Image
As an aside, we actually were psychic ourselves 5 years ago when we ran a list of suggested reboot ideas: the Frasier and Freddy reconciliation, moving back to Boston, Lilith popping up (at some point this season), Paris… it’s just a damn shame they didn’t go with the all-denim idea or post-apocalyptic Frasier. Trevor Einhorn would have looked badass with an eye patch! Scrambled eggs all over their face, I suppose.
Earlier this week, The Late Show host Stephen Colbert mocked the broke Pillow Man for claiming that he’s “lost everything, every dime” and can’t pay his lawyers. He even dressed up as Lindell — a.k.a. he wore a mustache — and smothered one pillow to death with another pillow.
Lindell addressed the public humiliation on Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast. “He’s such a scumbag,” he said, Newsweek reports. “Did I spell that right? S-C-U-M bag. I could’ve said it of lawyers, this guy is even worse.”
Lindell continued, “He attacked my employees directly, making fun of them. Gee, I want to protect my company, so I’m not going to continue with $2 million a month lawyer bills. I’m not going to let everything go down because of frivolous lawsuits and lawfare.” Colbert and his Late Night audience (which is code for “liberals”) “all laugh about my employees,” he added. “They have families, these guys have been with me for 20 years, we’re not going anywhere. And I know when I watch this, it just, it just sickened me.”
On Instagram yesterday (October 12), Megan shared a trio of posts that when seen in the grid on her profile page, read “Part One,” with the O in “One” represented by an ouroboros (a snake eating its own tail). All of the posts are actually galleries, and in them are photos and videos of more snake-like imagery, including Meg wearing some artificial fangs.
As for what this means, there are multiple theories floating around. Meg famously loves Halloween, so some speculate the posts have something to do with that, perhaps a reveal of what her costume is going to be. Others, though, think it could be the beginning of a new musical era.
Whatever the case, Megan is at least thinking about her next musical era. It appears it’ll be different than her last one, too, in at least one crucial way: Her label. Meg’s last album, 2022’s Traumazine, was released via 300 Entertainment and 1501 Certified. For her next endeavor, though, Meg apparently plans to go independent.
She said in a recent live broadcast, “I have no label right now. We’re doing everything funded straight out of Megan Thee Stallion pockets. So, the budget is coming from me. […] I’m so excited to be doing something for the first time independent since it was just me and my momma. So excited cause it’s really just me this go-round until we sign to a new label. But I don’t wanna sign to a new label right now because I just wanna do it myself.”
Megan Thee Stallion gives fans an update on her upcoming album; says she’s footing the bill while still fighting to get out of the record deal with 1501.
“I have no label right now, we’re doing everything funded straight out of Megan Thee Stallion’s pocket.” pic.twitter.com/5vOmVvLiLY
The third episode of The Golden Bachelorreminded us why our interest in this dating show universe has waned over the years. It’s not the catfights or the bro brawls — that’s the low-stakes drama that keeps things interesting. And it’s not the inescapable fact that most of these relationships aren’t built to last because life (and love) isn’t some televised fantasy filled with over-the-top romantic dates and tropical getaways where two people never have to confront the hard realities of their relationship … or the fact that one of them Facetime’s in public without headphones.
No, it’s that, most of the time, the guy these women are vying for is just plain boring.
That’s what Gary Turner is, at least at the moment. Nice? Sure, but boring. He’s the human equivalent of dial-up internet access and we’re all just waiting for him to boot up and show us something interesting. This week, he takes the ladies with performing in a talent show but never takes the stage himself. (Although, what talents he possesses other than not being able to drive on the freeway at night is anyone’s guess.) And it’s not Gary’s fault. The Bachelor has never asked any of its male cast to be extraordinary so a man with an emotional IQ greater than that of a peanut is miles above the low set bar already.
But dammit, we’d love to see something in Mr. Turner that justifies the somewhat problematic behavior on display from his potential love interests in this episode. Oh well. We gave peace a chance. Let the backstabbing begin.
Winner – Whoever Captioned The Talent Show Performances
In front of a backdrop constructed by what we can only assume was an elementary school theater troupe, the ladies must perform for their lives — and Gary’s amusement — in front of a celebrity judge and a crowd full of strangers. We don’t remember The Hunger Games ever being this dark. Most of the women have something entertaining up their sleeves. Sandra performs a stand-up set funnier than anything Chris Rock has done in years. April is the Beatnik chicken farmer giving an empowering spoken-word endorsement of Botox. Faith does her best Taylor Swift impression if the Eras tour was a retired woman with an adventure streak standing in front of an Indiana bumpkin, begging him to hop on her Harley and just live a little. Sandra shows Gary her karate skills — because nothing says romance like being able to bust through a plank of wood inches from a man’s genitals with just the force of your unsocked foot. And Ellen’s performance is a sex ed lesson she regularly gives to middle school students, which seems less like a talent and more like a punishment from the Universe for misdeeds in a past life.
The other women impress with poems, pushups, and party tricks but the real winner — besides Joan — is whoever was in charge of captioning their talents. Calling Nancy a “Whip Cream Catcher” is a hilarious interpretation of the word “catch.”
Loser – Motherhood
Motherhood is a truly confounding state of being. It’s both a gift and a curse, a role that many claim is the pinnacle of their existence, and also a job you never get to retire from that forces you to leave a reality dating show after scoring a rose and another one-on-one date with a man who had the potential to heal your broken heart. We understand why Joan had to bow out of the competition early, and it’s certainly not her daughter’s fault for having a difficult postpartum experience, but man, is this episode the best form of birth control we’ve seen in years.
Winner – Senior Citizen Saboteur Kathy
Does Kathy from Texas think she’s on a more glamorous version of Survivor? We’re truly asking because she’s forming alliances and sabotaging her fellow contestants like she’s on the chopping block of a tribal council, and Jeff Probst is about to unscroll her name on a piece of parchment. Her beef with Theresa is valid but her cutthroat tactics are eye-brow raising considering she hasn’t exchanged more than a dozen words with Gary since she arrived at the mansion. Theresa’s on her hit list because she got the first one-on-one … and because she wears t-shirts in child sizes. Over a cocktail party, she proclaims herself a bada** b*tch before crying in her confessional and then weaponizing those tears into guilting an early rose from Gary. That satisfied smirk she wore when walking back into the house to show off her hard-earned stem had us cackling out loud, as did her verbal sparring match with Theresa on the stairs. Girls watch out because Kathy came to play the game.
Loser – First One-On-One Date Boaster, Theresa
As devious as Kathy was this week, Theresa more than earned her ire. The woman has done nothing but brag about being chosen for the first one-on-one date, waxing poetic about her kitschy dinner death drive for three episodes now. As a viewer, we could interpret it as an insecurity. She hasn’t gotten alone time with Gary since that night so, perhaps, she’s feeling vulnerable and a bit unsure if the connection they had was real or just imagined. But to Kathy, it reads as mean girl tactics — an attempt by someone Gary obviously has a bond with to dissuade the women he has gotten to know yet from even trying. It’s territorial behavior but Theresa is definitely not an alpha type so when she’s confronted, first by April, then by Kathy, and finally by Gary, she breaks down in a blubbering mess.
Loser – Leslie’s Cookies
Leslie lets the competitive drive that helped her to bag Prince all those years ago hurt her chances with Gary this week. Her confidence in her on-stage moves convinced her she had scored a solo date before the rest of the women had their turn at the mic but a public lap dance only gets you so far … especially when you follow it up by force-feeding a man your stale cookies. What if he had a gluten allergy, Leslie?!
Winner – Sex Ed
Other than Nancy’s whip cream acrobatics, Ellen did the least during the talent show by simply reciting her memorized syllabus and encouraging grown men and women to get comfortable shouting the word, “vagina.” And yet, something about this fun-loving, free-spirited broad has got Gary hooked. He took all of two minutes after Joan’s abrupt departure to swoop Ellen off her feet with a custom dress fitting and a hot air balloon ride. From dark horse to front runner, Ellen made moves this week and we couldn’t be happier for her. (Or more terrified of what will happen when Kathy finds out she’s got a new rival.)
Loser – Good Hair
We know nothing, absolutely NOTHING about Edith, the retired realtor from California, except that she has likely lived most of her life under the envious glare of fine-haired women everywhere. Seriously, that coiffe is TRESemmé commercial quality and it deserves better than to be rejected in week three of a reality dating show competition. Get Edith’s hair an agent, stat!
For the past several weeks, Steven and Ian have planned to do a mailbag segment on the show. But they always end up yapping for too long, and the segment inevitably ends up getting bumped. This week, the guys finally rectified the situation by addressing some emails from their loyal listeners.
What do Indiecast listeners want to know about? Our first letter concerns the matter of seated shows vs. standing-room only shows, and which is preferable. You can probably guess what the 40something-year-old hosts of Indiecast think about this, though Steven makes a case for seated shows providing “guaranteed real estate” that you don’t have to defend if you leave temporarily to get a beer or go to the bathroom. From there, Steven and Ian finally address the email about The Weakerthans, and give their opinion on the beloved Canadian band. They also talk about their favorite indie-rock bassists of the last 25 years, and the legacy of the indie-folk band Beirut.
In Recommendation Corner, Ian talks about the Abe Vigoda offshoot Cupid & Psyche while Steven recommends the vibe-y Chicago rock act Squirrel Flower.
New episodes of Indiecast drop every Friday. Listen to Episode 159 here and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. You can submit questions for Steve and Ian at [email protected], and make sure to follow us on Instagram and Twitter for all the latest news. We also recently launched a visualizer for our favorite Indiecast moments. Check those out here.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.