GoneTrending

There’s no getting around the hiked-up prices of rare and delicious bourbon whiskeys these days. A lot of great but very limited releases (“allocated” if you want to get all technical about it) bourbons are not only hard to find but inflated price-wise when you do stumble across them. Retailers (in non-state-run states) will put seemingly insane price tags on the most sought-after bottles of, say, Weller 12-Year or Pappy Van Winkle 15-Year even though those whiskeys are supposed to cost $40 and $99, respectively. Add in that aftermarket sellers will also sell you those same bottles at ridiculously higher prices, and you have the perfect storm of what should be accessible and excellent whiskey ending up as prohibitively expensive (if you can even find it).

That begs the question, do bourbons that theoretically ought to cost $50 but really cost $500 or stack up against bourbons that actually cost $500 at MSRP (manufacturer’s suggested retail price)? That’s what today’s blind taste test hopes to find out.

Before we dive in, let’s get some context out of the way. This inflation of price in rare and heavily desired bourbon is the system we live in this world. It’s no different than Nikes, Rolexes, Supreme gear, wine, scotch, or any other product that has the perfect balance of rarity, quality, and consumer desire. Thinking that bourbon should somehow be exempt from this system is, well, naive at best and delusional at worst (it’s a simple misunderstanding of how our economy works on a fundamental level). We live in a world/economy where rarity, desirability, and quality are going to drive the market and therefore explode prices into the stratosphere. I’m not saying it’s fair but point to a single thing in this world that is.

Still, are the $50 bottles getting that massively inflated price point really so good? Are those bourbons truly as good or even better than bottles of rare whiskey that actually cost $500 (due to true rarity or age and not just hype)? I gathered some bottles that touch on this exact conundrum and had my wife shuffle and pour them so I could answer exactly that.

That makes our lineup today the following bourbons:

• Old Rip Van Winkle Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey Aged 10 Years ($69 MSRP)
• Chicken Cock Chanticleer Cognac Barrel Finish Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey ($499 MSRP)
• E. H. Taylor, Jr. Single Barrel Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey Bottled In Bond ($60 MSRP)
• Rare Hare 1953 Straight Bourbon Whiskey Finished in XXO Cognac Casks ($585 MSRP)
• Michter’s US*1 Limited Release Toasted Barrel Finish Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey ($55 MSRP)
• Barrell Craft Spirits Gold Label Bourbon ($499 MSRP)
• Weller The Original Wheated Bourbon Aged 12 Years Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey ($40 MSRP)
• Heaven’s Door The Bootleg Series Volume IV Wheated Bourbon Finished in Islay Scotch Casks Aged 11 Years Cask Strength ($499 MSRP)

Yes, a couple of these are $60 and above and one is below. It all averages out in the end and they all top out at or over $500 in the real world. Moreover, the actual prices on these bottles at retail are going to range pretty far and wide but are always around $500.

One huge reason for that is that most of these whiskeys have vintages. Finding a, say, Old Rip 10-Year from 2022 is going to be cheaper than finding one from 2019 or even 2010. Likewise, that Rare Hare release is actually cheaper than its MSRP (because few people care about it). To sum up, there are a million factors that influence the exact price that you might find from the vintage (year released) to local taxes/allocations to the literal whims of local retailers.

Lastly, when it comes to ranking these bourbons, it’s about one thing only: Taste. What tastes best is my modus operandi. I’m ranking them accordingly and we will all see if those $40-$60 bottles that cost around $500 actually stand up to the real-deal $500 bourbons. Let’s dive in!

• The 100 Best Bourbon Whiskeys From Kentucky, Ranked
• The 100 Best Bourbon Whiskeys Of 2022, Ranked
• Our Head Drinks Critic Reveals The Expensive Bourbons He *Won’t* Pay Above Retail For
• The Absolute Best Bourbons Between $50-$60, Ranked
• Every Single Buffalo Trace Whiskey & Spirits Brand, Ranked

Part 1 — The $500 Bourbon Blind Tasting

Taste 1

Tasting Notes:

Nose: The nose opens with a sense of old barrels next to rum-raisin folded into a honey-nut creamy fudge cluster with pecans and walnuts and dusted with powdered sugar, sweet cinnamon, and orange zest.

Palate: The palate leans into salted caramel with vanilla cream next to stewed apples with maple doughnut frosting and a twinge of old dates soaked in black tea.

Finish: The end has a moment of black pepperiness before heading toward woody winter spices, old piles of orchard wood with a hint of black mold, and soft leaves of chewy tobacco laced with dark chocolate, salted caramel, and marzipan.

Initial Thoughts:

This is pretty good bourbon. It was a little tannic (old barrels) on the nose but delved deeply into stone-cold classic Kentucky bourbon vibes after that.

Overall, it didn’t feel “special” though. It felt like a “really good and very classic” bourbon.

Taste 2

Tasting Notes:

Nose: The nose is supple and full of creamed honey, moist marzipan, peaches and cream ice cream with a hint of waffle cone, and fresh plums dashed with clove and star anise.

Palate: The palate leans into the plums with a spiced cake vibe next to rich Black Forest Cake, candied dates, rum-raisin, and banana bread with plenty of butter, cinnamon, and walnut with a twist of fresh orange zest.

Finish: The end embraces the orange and adds in salted dark chocolate tobacco with a hint of brown butter, pecan shells, and cedar boughs.

Initial Thoughts:

This feels special. There’s a depth that just goes and goes with a classic vibe overall. It’s also amazingly well-balanced.

Taste 3

Tasting Notes:

Nose: Dried dark fruits and a hint of vanilla wafers mingle with fig fruit leather, a touch of orchard wood, and a deep caramel on the nose that leads to this very nostalgic sense of sunny backyards on lazy summer days of childhood. It’s almost mesmerizing.

Palate: The palate holds onto those notes while layering in dark berry tobacco with sharp winter spices, new leather, and a singed cotton candy next to a cedar box filled with that tobacco.

Finish: The finish lingers on your senses for a while and leaves the spice behind for that dark, almost savory fruit note with an echo of blackberry Hostess pies next to soft leather pouches that have held chewy tobacco for decades and a final hint of old porch wicker in the middle of summer.

Initial Thoughts:

This is excellent bourbon that also feels very special. There’s real depth here and it plays like a one-of-a-kind experience that’s somehow super comforting thanks to a deep familiarity.

Taste 4

Tasting Notes:

Nose: The nose is like walking into a health food store and setting up camp on the vitamin aisle before dark fruit leather next to brandy-soaked raisins arrive next to a clear yet soft graininess that’s very Tennessee hollow on a cold fall day.

Palate: There’s a hint of clove and toffee on the nose that leads into the palate with a sense of sharp cinnamon spice next to a touch of black licorice that’s kind of like a black Necco Wafer.

Finish: The end leans back into that autumnal forest with a barky chewiness that’s slightly sweet and fruity next to a final note of salted toffee drizzle over a thin line of sour cherry tobacco leaf.

Initial Thoughts:

This is boldly a Tennessee whiskey that really leans into the multi-vitamin and chalkiness of it all. It was really hard to get into and a little light overall.

Taste 5

Tasting Notes:

Nose: This opens with a pecan pie vibe that’s nutty, dry, and full of dark Caro syrup sweetness with a hint of candied orange peels, a touch of cinnamon, and dry cedar bark.

Palate: The palate holds onto the sweetness as it leans towards a campfire roasted marshmallow, a touch of saffron and clove-stewed pears, a pile of sappy firewood, and creamy nuances of vanilla pudding all meander through your senses.

Finish: The end has a light savory nature that leads back to the pear, vanilla, and marshmallow on a very slow fade toward a pile of fresh firewood piled high on soft black soil.

Initial Thoughts:

This is very nice but a bit of an outlier thanks to the deep nuttiness and the dryness that comes along with that. Still, it’s balanced excellently with soft fruits and creamy sweetness.

If I had to guess, this is a cheaper whiskey that costs a lot of money thanks to that balancing act and the uniqueness of the overall profile.

Taste 6

Tasting Notes:

Nose: The nose opens with a sense of wet oak staves (think rained on barrels) next to freshly pressed sugar cane juice, damp, almost still unharvested cherry tobacco leaves, the seeds from a vanilla pod, rainwater, stringy cedar bark, and fresh apricot next to Bing cherry.

Palate: Dark cherry leads to candied ginger on the opening of the taste as orange marmalade mingles with toasted sourdough, sticky yet subtle fir resin, and creamy key lime pie filling with just a hint of the butter in the crust of that pie. The mid-palate leans into the sugar in that pie filling as the cherry kicks back in with a sliver of tartness next to overripe peaches, dried hibiscus, mild anise, allspice berries, sassafras, and dried cacao nibs.

Finish: The finish gently steps through a field full of orange blossoms as that cacao dries out more, leaving you with dried choco-cherry tobacco that’s been inside a cedar box wrapped in decades-old leather.

Initial Thoughts:

This pour was almost mind-blowingly better than the rest. The depth alone was fantastic while the balance of both pure nostalgic classic bourbon with so much more and interesting notes really drove home that this was not only special but quintessential.

Taste 7

Tasting Notes:

Nose: The nose hits softly with bruised peaches and old pears next to fresh wool sweaters, vanilla pancake batter, and moist marzipan next to orange oils, worn-out wicker deck furniture, and old Buffalo Trace leather with a faint hint of dried roses.

Palate: The palate kicks around cherry bark and apple-cider-soaked cinnamon sticks with spiced cranberry sauce over buttermilk biscuits and gingerbread.

Finish: The end leans into the sharp brown spices with a mild sense of vanilla cake with apple cider and cinnamon frosting, a touch of burnt orange, and more of that moist marzipan covered in salted dark chocolate with this faint hint of proofing water at the very end.

Initial Thoughts:

This was nice and classic whiskey but ended a little thinly. That’s a shame because this is good stuff but not particularly memorable.

Taste 8

Tasting Notes:

Nose: Old lawn wicker and worn-out leather tobacco pouches mingle with Christmas plum pudding, rich and most marzipan, and campfire-kissed marshmallow with this faint trace of burnt incense ash.

Palate: There’s a sense of old corn husks that leads to old oak staves, orchards full of dead leaves, sour cherry, marzipan cut with dark orange oils, and this fleeting speck of beef tallow.

Finish: That whisper of umami leads back to the dark orchard fruits, soft nuttiness, and mild medley of botanical winter spices with a chewy fresh tobacco vibe.

Initial Thoughts:

Again, this is mind-blowingly better than everything except taste six. It’s deep, complex, vibrant, textured, classic, fresh, and just sublime to sip.

I’m going to have to go back to this and taste six a few times if I’m going to pick a winner between them. They’re both far and away the best pours.

Part 2 — The $500 Bourhon Ranking

8. Rare Hare 1953 Straight Bourbon Whiskey Finished in XXO Cognac Casks ($585 MSRP) — Taste 4

ABV: 55.5%

Average Price: $496

The Whiskey:

The juice in the bottle is a blend of 17-year-old bourbons from undisclosed sources in Tennessee. Those 17-year-old barrels were blended and then re-barreled into XXO Cognac casks (barrels that held brandy for at least 14 years in Cognac, France) for an additional 12 months of mellowing. Finally, that juice is vatted and bottled as-is into 1,953 bottles.

Bottom Line:

This is very Tennessee whiskey in that health store multi-vitamin chalkiness. That’s going to be hard to get over for a lot of people out there. And let’s be honest, you shouldn’t have to get past anything if you’re paying $500. That probably explains why this is one sale everywhere for almost $100 cheaper.

7. Weller The Original Wheated Bourbon Aged 12 Years Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey ($40 MSRP) — Taste 7

ABV: 45%

Average Price: $457

The Whiskey:

This Buffalo Trace whiskey rests in the warehouse for 12 long years, in the same barrels and warehouses as Pappy van Winkle whiskeys. The difference between this and Pappy 12 — good ol’ “Lot B” — is pretty simple actually. If the barrel doesn’t hit the exact flavor profile needed for a Pappy, it’s sent to the blending house to become a Weller (as long as it hits Weller’s flavor profile, of course). So yes, this could have been a Pappy 12 had the flavor profile been slightly different in the barrel. Regardless, this is then batched and proofed down for bottling.

Bottom Line:

The low proof really drew this one back on this tasting panel. This whiskey tasted the most inexpensive by far. It’s still a great-tasting whiskey, but not for anything close to that price point. If you could get this at $40 or $50 at retail, then we’d be having a completely different conversation.

6. Michter’s US*1 Limited Release Toasted Barrel Finish Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey ($55 MSRP) — Taste 5

ABV: 45.7%

Average Price: $588

The Whiskey:

Michter’s originally dropped this back in 2014; it has since become a mainstay of their release schedule. The whiskey is standard bourbon that’s then finished in a toasted barrel from the famed Kelvin Cooperage in Louisville. They build these barrels by hand from 18-month air-dried white oak and then lightly toast (not char) the inside before the aged whiskey goes in.

Bottom Line:

This was very good but didn’t quite pop. There was a lot going on, it all made sense, and this tasted very good. It just didn’t feel like a $500 pour at all. It did, however, feel like a great $50 pour with a truly one-of-a-kind flavor profile that just works, especially if you’re an oak-head.

5. Old Rip Van Winkle Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey Aged 10 Years ($69 MSRP) — Taste 1

ABV: 53.5%

Average Price: $799

The Whiskey:

This is Pappy at 10 years old but not “technically” Pappy (this is a “Van Winkle” expression, which are the entry-point expressions from the brand). Semantics aside, this is the same wheated juice that hits its prime at 10 years instead of 12, 15, or 20 years. The main difference here — besides the younger age — is the proof. This goes into the bottle with only a touch of water, keeping it far closer to barrel-proof at 107 proof.

Bottom Line:

You can find these for around $520 (I have) but it’s rare. Price aside, I really like this one. It feels like a solid 10-year-old bourbon but I cannot say it’s that much better than an Eagle Rare 10-year which only costs $50.

If this was only $70 a bottle and sitting next to a $50 Eagle Rare 10 on the shelf, I’d buy both — one for sipping and one for mixing — and be very happy. This is delicious. Don’t for a second get me wrong.

4. Chicken Cock Chanticleer Cognac Barrel Finish Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey ($499 MSRP) — Taste 2

ABV: 56%

Average Price: $499

The Whiskey:

This super rare whiskey is made from a classic mash of 70% corn, 21% rye, and 9% malted barley. That whiskey was aged for an undisclosed amount of years before it was re-barreled into 32 French cognac barrels. Those 32 barrels were then batched, proofed, and bottled as-is for this release.

Bottom Line:

This is where we get into the “wow” pours. This instantly was just better. I liked a few pours a bit more (they just had a tad more depth), but this was excellent bourbon that truly tasted like you were getting something deeply special and unique.

3. E. H. Taylor, Jr. Single Barrel Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey Bottled In Bond ($60 MSRP) — Taste 3

ABV: 50%

Average Price: $499

The Whiskey:

This whiskey is aged in the famed Warehouse C at Buffalo Trace from their Mash Bill No. 1. In this case, single barrels are picked for their perfect Taylor flavor profile and bottled one at a time with a slight touch of water to bring them down to bottled-in-bond proof.

Bottom Line:

This is really, really good bourbon. In fact, this felt and tasted special while being probably the most “classic” bourbon pour on the list. It just goes to show that you can be “classic” while still offering so much more.

I honestly couldn’t tell if this was truly expensive or just “marked up” expensive. That said, it didn’t touch the next two when it comes to true brilliance.

2. Barrell Craft Spirits Gold Label Bourbon ($499 MSRP) — Taste 6

ABV: 56.77%

MSRP: $499

The Whiskey:

This whiskey is a blend of Indiana, Tennessee, and Kentucky bourbons. Each barrel in that blend is a minimum of 16 years old. The barrels were specifically chosen for their cherry, nutty, high-proof, and chocolate profiles. Half of those barrels were then finished in new American oak for a final touch of maturation before vatting and bottling as-is.

Bottom Line:

This was so good that it was almost unbelievable. There was a depth and balance that was just unparalleled (in six out of the eight pours on this panel). This was so clearly a rare and expensive bourbon because it just tasted, well, really f*cking special.

The only reason that it’s not tied for number one is that the next pour was a little more of a surprise on the palate. Still, this is stellar.

1. Heaven’s Door The Bootleg Series Volume IV Wheated Bourbon Finished in Islay Scotch Casks Aged 11 Years Cask Strength ($499 MSRP) — Taste 8

ABV: 55.5%

Average Price: $499

The Whiskey:

This late 2022 release from Heaven’s Door carries on the tradition of the Bootleg Series being stellar. The whiskey in the bottle is a wheated bourbon that spent 11 years mellowing before being re-casked in old Islay Scotch whisky casks. After a final rest, those barrels were batched and bottled as-is.

Bottom Line:

This has everything you could ever want in a complex, enticing, and delicious whiskey — nuance, balance, and enough flavor notes to draw you in without seeming muddy or overwhelming.

Truly, this is a whiskey where you smell it and know immediately that you’re in the presence of something truly great. Moreover, that was blatantly obvious from the first moment of interacting with the glass. It just instantly read more refined and deeper and never let up while providing a wonderful experience from beginning to end. This is real first-class whiskey.

Part 3 — Final Thoughts on $500 Bourbons

The top two whiskeys on this list are something truly special. I cannot overemphasize that. Are they worth their real $500 price tag? Yes. No question. I’d also argue that the Chicken Cock release is worthy.

Amazingly, the only $50 bourbon that I would also say is worth its inflated price point is the E.H. Taylor, Jr., Single Barrel. It’s pretty much a perfect classic Kentucky bourbon.

The rest… meh. Not really. The Old Rip 10-Year is perfectly fine but not the best option if you’re looking for a Pappy to fall in love with — that’d be Pappy Van Winkle 15-year. The Weller and Michter’s are also perfectly fine pours but don’t have the special pop that merits those prices. The Rare Hare is a hard pass (on this panel).

So there you have it. For the most part, the price and worth of these whiskeys just depends. There are $500 whiskeys that don’t live up to their high prices. There are $50 whiskeys that should cost way more and do. But let’s be real, three of the top four were all true $500 bottles. That should tell you everything you need to know.

The world of Michelle Zauner’s Crying In H Mart started as a relatively intimate thing, but it just continued to grow. The Japanese Breakfast musician wrote an essay for the New Yorker, which landed Zauner a book deal to expand on the essay. Zauner released the memoir in 2021 and it was a major success that ended up being one of the year’s most talked-about books. Not long after the book came out, it was announced that Crying In H Mart would be adapted into a movie.

Now, he have a new update about the film, specifically who will play the role of Zauner. Well, we don’t know who will get the part yet, but we do know that it could be just about anybody, as Zauner has announced an open casting call for the role.

On social media today (May 22), Zauner shared a poster that reads, “ISO 18-25 year old Korean American to play the role of Michelle in the film adaptation of the #1 NYTimes Bestseller Crying in H Mart. Please send a creative video introduction that includes where you’re located.” The email for submissions is [email protected].

It was previously revealed that Will Sharpe (also known as Ethan on The White Lotus) is set to direct the movie.

Gone are the days when you could pop into the movie theater for a quick afternoon showing of your favorite animated feature because now movies are big events that need to take up nearly half of your day and require a bathroom break. But it’s fun!

The latest blockbuster to make a splash on the big screen will be the live-action adaptation of The Little Mermaid which hits theaters just in time to make your Memorial Day weekend memorable. The original 1989 animated film clocked in at an hour and 25 minutes of singing, swimming, and dancing (both humans and fish alike) but the 2023 remake seems to have more of a story to tell.

This year’s Mermaid will run 2 hours and 15 minutes, according to the AMC website, meaning there is another full hour of aquatic adventures and evil sea witch shenanigans. It will be hard to time your bathroom breaks with all of that water imagery, so be prepared.

The Little Mermaid stars Halle Bailey as the protagonist who wishes to live above water, where there are people and, more importantly, an absence of sea wenches. The evil Ursula is played by Melissa McCarthy, while Eric will be portrayed by Jonah Hauer-King, which is a great name for a prince. Daveed Digs, Awkwafina, Javier Bardem, and Jacob Tremblay also star.

You can catch The Little Mermaid in theaters on May 26th.

Bill Maher has heaped a huge amount of praise on Joe Rogan. During the latest episode of Maher’s podcast, the Real Time host gushed to Kathy Griffin that Rogan is basically “our generation’s Larry King.”

“He’s not looking for a fight and he is willing to open the mic to people,” Maher said to Griffin. “Even the ones that the establishment of some kind or another says, ‘How dare you let that person speak?’”

While Griffin argued that Rogan basically is “establishment” due to his broad reach and massive audience, Maher continued to speak glowingly of the controversial podcaster.

Via Mediaite:

What Joe does, he kind of opens that mic like Larry did. Elon Musk will do that show and like the biggest people in the world because they know of the reach. And I just think also Joe earned that. It’s like this is just a regular guy smarter than the average bear, but is not gonna be intimidated first of all by you saying, don’t platform this guy or don’t listen to this and will let anybody speak and usually has a common sense view of it, of his own.

Eventually, Maher came back down to earth and offered at least one bit of criticism about Rogan. Emphasis on “bit.”

“You know, he’s a little to the right of where I am on things,” Maher conceded. Dang, dude, don’t hold back.

(Via Mediaite)

After getting outworked at home by the Miami Heat and falling in a 2-0 hole, the Celtics entered Sunday night as, theoretically, the desperate team. The reigning Eastern Conference champions faced a must-win situation, given the NBA has never seen a team come back from 3-0 down to win a series, and promptly came out and laid an egg.

Game 3 was the Celtics worst performance of the playoffs. It was a failure at every level, but seeing both Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown no-show a game of that magnitude was particularly noteworthy. The two combined to go 12-of-35 from the field (1-of-14 from three-point range) for 26 points in the biggest game of the season, before being pulled after three quarters with Miami up 30. Their inability to meet the moment stood in stark contrast to the Heat team on the other side, which seemingly only gets better as the lights get brighter.

There is a disconnect in Boston right now that no one can figure out. First year head coach Joe Mazzulla took responsibility after Game 3 for not having the team ready to play, saying it’s on him to put together the right plan and get them all on the same page. That this team, with a core that’s been to four conference finals in five years, needs to be properly motivated by the coach to get up for a Game 3 down 2-0 is a problem in and of itself. That Mazzulla couldn’t do it shows the cracks in the foundation that Brad Stevens and company have been trying desperately to paper over.

Jaylen Brown called Game 3 “embarrassing” and said it’s a collective issue, not wanting to point fingers — which is what I would also not want to do when many of the fingers would be pointing at me. He seemed as baffled as anyone how the team (including himself) played as poorly as they did. He and Jayson Tatum both said the team has to come out and play with “some pride” in the next game, which is, again, not a great thing to have to strive for down 3-0 in the conference finals against a team you were, on paper, much better than.

It was clear after Game 3 that Boston is out of explanations and excuses. It’s one thing to lose to a team with three championships like the Warriors, or to be the young team on the rise that takes its lumps against a LeBron-led Cavs team that won the East every year. Those are the kinds of losses that can be viewed as lessons to learn from. Losing in this fashion to an 8-seeded Heat team operating at a theoretical (albeit, not in practice) talent deficit, is not one of those. That’s the kind of thing that leads to significant changes in an organization.

It has to be noted that what Miami has done this postseason, particularly against the Bucks and Celtics, has been nothing short of astounding. Their shot-making has been at a level no one could’ve predicted coming in, knocking down 46 percent of their threes in eight games across those two series (falling back to earth in between against the Knicks).

Jimmy Butler seemingly hits every big shot he’s asked to, but he’s not alone. Bam Adebayo has found another gear offensively that has been critical to punishing defenses that try to collapse on Butler. Kyle Lowry has regained his form of old after a dreadful year-plus in Miami, giving them another guard capable of creating for others. Gabe Vincent, Max Strus, and Caleb Martin have each been phenomenal on both ends of the floor (outplaying their much more highly regarded role-playing counterparts in Boston), and Duncan Robinson, after a year-plus on the bench, has been revived and is just back to his bubble ways, knocking down seemingly everything.

However, what Miami is doing also shows what Boston is lacking. Every player on Miami looks like they are playing with supreme confidence, and they’re doing so because of the way they feed off of Jimmy Butler (and to a slightly lesser degree Bam Adebayo). Caleb Martin explained as much after Game 3, pointing out how it’s impossible not to be confident when the guy playing better than anyone in the playoffs is extending that trust to you.

There is none of that happening in Boston, where confidence is waning, in large part because the team’s stars seem unsure of themselves and the rest of the team. Tatum and Brown don’t have that same trust in the “others” and it shows up in the biggest moments. This is a team that’s struggled all year with holding fourth quarter leads, regularly allowing teams to claw back into games as their halfcourt offense stalls out. Their stars tend to get tunnel vision, trying to shoulder the load themselves to drag the team out of the mud. At times it works, just ask the Sixers who watched Tatum pile up 53 points in Game 7 to get the Celtics to this point, but what can also happen is they just spin their tires and sink deeper.

We’ve seen that play out in this series in the moments where Miami starts to grab hold of the game, Boston simply cannot produce enough to keep up. The third quarter of Game 1 (25 points), fourth quarter of Game 2 (22 points), and the third quarter of Game 3 (17 points) have been the three most important quarters of the series, and Boston simply has not been up to the task on either end of the floor.

Whenever this series ends, and it certainly seems like that will happen soon, Boston will enter the offseason with pressure as high as its been in some time to make serious changes. To this point, the Celtics have been patient with their young core and seemed ready to reap the rewards of that approach coming off of a Finals appearance last year. There has been ample chatter over the years about breaking up the Tatum and Brown pairing, with many wondering if two players that want to do similar things on the ball are best suited playing with each other. Last year’s run quieted that notion, but a dismal showing against Miami has rekindled those doubts.

It’s part of the difficulty in making the leap as a team. This is no longer a young team on the rise, but a contender expected to win championships — or at the least, go out in a way befitting of a title contender. Patience is no longer something afforded to them, and after spending last offseason seemingly bolstering the roster around the stars with what they needed, adding 6MOY Malcolm Brogdon to be a steady hand for the second unit, the focus will again shift to their star duo this offseason. Brown getting set to enter a contract year only heightens the attention on him, as his performance has been particularly woeful against the Heat, and with Tatum already on a max and the new CBA set to kick in, it’s a fair question to wonder whether Boston will want to give Brown the deal he undoubtedly will be seeking.

Very little seems off the table for Boston as they head into this offseason, joining an astounding number of teams that are disgruntled at the way this season ended. It was a year that felt wide open in the NBA and the playoffs have showed that to be the case, with an 8-seed and 7-seed reaching the conference finals. That meant teams at the top (and even in the middle) felt they had a real chance at a title, and falling short in a year like this where the cards were seemingly in their favor only adds to the frustration.

Joe Mazzulla, freshly signed to a new contract this season, certainly will be under examination given the caliber of coaches on the market, but Brad Stevens must first determine what direction he wants to go with the roster before he makes a decision on the coach. If the issue is connecting with this particular group, that’s maybe less of a concern if a sizable roster shakeup is on the way. Still, with Monty Williams, Doc Rivers, Nick Nurse, and Mike Budenholzer all out of jobs currently, Boston could seek out a veteran presence on the bench to bring a more commanding voice to the locker room.

Brown will be highly sought after given his two-way talents, and after years of rumblings he could get moved, this summer might bring that to fruition. Tatum will almost assuredly remain the centerpiece, but what would they identify as the missing secondary piece should they decide to shop Brown (again)? If it’s in the backcourt, that could lead to more changes. They already have solid point guard depth with Brogdon, Derrick White, and Marcus Smart, but if the goal is to add a star caliber guard in a Brown trade, moving one of them for help elsewhere makes sense.

This season was supposed to be the culmination of years of patience with a talented homegrown core, much like what’s happening in Denver. Boston finally reaping the reward for keeping its All-Star duo together and building around them in the face of external pressure to break them up. They should have been sitting above all of the chaos set to take place this offseason, cementing their position as the team all the others are chasing. Instead, they will find themselves right in the midst of it all.

The moment they are eliminated, the post-mortems will begin. Sourced stories on internal discord, a young coach in over his head, and a star duo growing further apart seem like a lock. It’s a far cry from where they started the year as the heirs apparent, but going out like this, with no explanations and no excuses, leaves little to do but make changes.

Last week, Florida governor Ron DeSantis signed a series of bills targeting drag shows and transgender rights. One of the bills prevents minors from going to drag shows. So, what Tool leader Maynard James Keenan did in Florida this weekend sure felt like a protest of that.

As Consequence notes, Tool performed at Daytona Beach’s Welcome To Rockville festival for their first show of 2023. During the set, Keenan dressed on drag, donning a blonde wig, red lipstick applied well beyond his lips, and fake boobs (Consequence photographer Amy Harris took photos of Keenan’s look). Given that Welcome To Rockville is an all-ages event, it would seem Keenan was technically violating the new Florida law.

Neither Keenan nor Tool have yet to address Keenan’s outfit choice, but Tool did share some photos and videos from the performance on their Instagram Story, like this official one from the festival:

Beyond this past weekend, Tool has a relatively quiet schedule for 2023 so far. According to the band’s website, their only scheduled live shows for the rest of the year are festival appearances. They’re set to play Sonic Temple in Columbus, Ohio on May 25; Louder Than Life in Louisville, Kentucky on September 22; Aftershock in Sacramento, California on October 6; and Power Trip in Indio, California on October 8.

Some actors give off very specific scent auras. For example, Tom Cruise probably smells like expensive cologne mixed with jet fuel and fear, and we all know Matthew McConaughey smells like the parking lot outside of a Texas Roadhouse. There are a select few actors who just look like they smell like a warm vanilla candle, and Jude Law is definitely one of them.

But while Law was preparing to star as King Henry VII in the historical thriller Firebrand, he soon realized that he could not smell like a delicious British cookie. He actually had to smell pretty bad. After doing some research, Law learned that the King was quite smelly and vile, thanks to his swollen legs and various ulcers. This isn’t uncommon among royalty, it seems.

While at the Cannes Film Festival (per Variety), Law explained, “I read several interesting accounts that you could smell Henry three rooms away. His leg was rotting so badly. He hid it with rose oil,” Law explained. But the actor didn’t want to just take the easy route. “I thought it would have a great impact if I smelt awful.” It seemed to have worked.

In order to achieve such a smell, Law had to take matters into his own hands and found a perfume specialist who would create the cooky concoction that would smell like a mix between a porta potty and a middle school gym.

“She makes wonderful scents, and she also makes awful scents,” Law explained.” She somehow came up with this extraordinary variety of blood, fecal matter, and sweat.” This is what most historical movie sets smell like, so it shouldn’t have been that hard.

Did the rest of the cast appreciate the poop perfume? They sure didn’t! Even the film’s director, Karim Ainouz, said “When Jude walked in on set… it was just horrible.” While can assume he was talking about the smell, maybe Jude Law is a grumpy dude on set. Hopefully, he didn’t keep the perfume, but maybe his next role will be The Smelly Pope. Just think about it, it could work.

(Via Variety)

The late Nirvana lead singer Kurt Cobain left behind an unquantifiable legacy, but his tools for doing so carry a substantial price tag. In October 2019, the cardigan worn by Cobain during his 1993 MTV: Unplugged set sold for $334,000. Julien’s Auctions sold a “smashed and autographed” 1973 Fender Mustang played by Cobain for $486,400 last fall.

And Julien’s Auctions was at it again over the weekend.

“Sold for $595,900. A lefty black Fender Stratocaster electric guitar, smashed by Kurt Cobain during Nirvana’s Nevermind era and signed to the body by all three band members,” the auction house captioned an Instagram post. “Sold in Julien’s Auctions ‘Music Icons’ at the Hard Rock Cafe in New York City, May 19th – 21st and on julienslive.com.”

According to several outlets such as Billboard, Entertainment Weekly, and People, the guitar was initially listed at and estimated to go for $60,000.

“Beyond being played by Cobain before he smashed it, the reassembled but unplayable guitar was signed by all three members of Nirvana — Cobain, Krist Novoselic, and Dave Grohl — along with additional inscriptions to Mark Lanegan (Screaming Trees) by Cobain that read: ‘Hell-o Mark! Love, Your Pal, Kurdt Kobain / Washed up rockstar,’” People relayed, citing Julien’s Auctions listing.

During the same “Music Icons” auction, Julien’s Auctions also sold an oversized Nevermind promotional poster for $10,400 as well as an autographed setlist “believed to have been handwritten by” Grohl for $50,800. The setlist was for a Nirvana performance at OK Hotel in Seattle on April 17, 1991.

See those items below.

Even with fans making all kinds of out-of-pocket comments about her, Chlöe hasn’t been shy about showing off her body since starting her solo career with the unapologetic video for “Have Mercy.” Since then, she’s met every critical comment with another carefree moment reinforcing her self-love — and doubled down on displaying her assets, whether those commenters like it or not.

So it makes sense that after she had a booming busy season that included her controversial appearance in Swarm, the release of her first-ever solo album, and the tour for that album, she’s taking a vacation. She shared a compilation video from her time in paradise (it looks a lot like Hawaii) on social media, and once again bared nearly all with a series of skimpy bikinis that showed off her curves as she surfed, lounged, and soaked up the sun during her island getaway.

The difference is, it appears to be sinking in that she’s not going to let the trolls shake her confidence, so instead, the majority of the comments are praising her, congratulating her on taking some time for herself, and generally loving the look she gave behind the curtain of her rest and relaxation time.

Sen. Josh Hawley, the MAGA “laughingstock” and “fleeing coward” as branded by his Kansas City hometown paper, will never live down his insurrectionist fist-pumping and cowardly running on January 6. Hawley has somehow also been insisting that American men simply are not masculine enough these days, so of course he decided to write a book called Manhood: The Masculine Virtues America Needs. The book has been both review bombed and lambasted, and it’s awfully silly to stress one’s own alleged masculinity so much because that effort tends to have a counter effect. And if you’re ready to hear this obsession be called out as BS, then Jon Hamm is here to help.

The man who embodied Don Draper surely knows a thing of two about toxic masculinity, so Hamm lent his voice to an ad for Democratic Senate candidate and Marine veteran Lucas Kunce, who walks the walk. As tweeted by Morning Joe co-host Joe Scarborough, the ad paints a portrait of how “manhood really looks.” The ad perfectly times some of Hawley’s most infamous “hits” (including the insurrection sprint) with damning voiceovers from Hamm, including the following: “In Missouri, you can’t fake courage. We’re the ‘Show Me State.’ Courage is something you have to show us.”

Hamm then effortlessly guides us through how “manhood” is shown through deeds like serving in the Marines, rather than through mere words or by controlling other people (i.e., women) through abortion bans. The actor then concludes, “If you wanna be told about ‘Manhood,’ some guy wrote a book about it. But if you want someone to show you courage, send Lucas Kunce to the U.S. Senate.”

It’s a damn effective ad that is much more convincing at defining “manhood” than Hawley’s curious insistence that he’s full of testosterone or Tucker Carlson’s testicle-tanning montage. Imagine that.