Categories
News Trending Viral Worldwide

Trump Is Making Tweet-Threats About ’60 Minutes’ Amid The Preview Of A Confrontation Prior To His Walkout

Earlier this week, President Trump walked out of a 60 Minutes interview with veteran journalist Lesley Stahl. One could fairly conclude that the taping sessions did not go well, given that Trump cut the whole thing short, and now, 60 Minutes is previewing one of the confrontations that preceded his departure. It’s a contentious moment with Stahl calling out Trump for lying about how he “created the greatest economy in the history of our country.” To that, Stahl responded, “You know that’s not true!” Well, he shot back, “It’s totally true,” to which she held firm: “No.”

Trump obviously wasn’t thrilled to be called out on his lies and embellishments, and apparently, the situation escalated to the point where he didn’t wish to continue. Stahl certainly isn’t Sean Hannity, who doesn’t (as 60 Minutes does) have “a history of asking tough questions of presidential candidates during the run-up to the election.” Well, Trump woke up this morning and tweeted a (second) threat to “soon be giving a first in television history full, unedited preview of the vicious attempted ‘takeout’ interview of me by Lesley Stahl.” He claims that she was full of “anger” in the face of his “full, flowing and ‘magnificently brilliant’ answers to their ‘Q’s’.”

So, he’s claiming to have his own tapes of the interview? That’s very strange, but yes, that’s what he was also suggesting last night.

After word broke that he’d left the interview early, the mask-adverse Trump tweeted a strange clip of Stahl not wearing a mask.

And he also tweeted out some photos of Kayleigh McEnany handing Stahl a book-shaped object that Trump claims contains his contributions to healthcare. Well, the full interview should be an interesting watch on Sunday. (And maybe Trump’s got some “unedited” version on tape, too. Who really knows these days?)

Categories
News Trending Viral Worldwide

Filmmaker Kirsten Johnson On Making The Surprisingly Uplifting ‘Dick Johnson Is Dead’

Her father, Dick Johnson’s dementia diagnosis was what inspired Kirsten Johnson to make Dick Johnson Is Dead, a fanciful documentary in which Kirsten imagines various scenarios for her father’s death and makes him act them out — complete with make-up, fake blood, stunt people… the whole nine. It all culminates in a tragicomic fake funeral, where parishioners know Dick isn’t really dead but grieve anyway, in a surreal scene that makes you wonder who’s performing for who.

Hearing what it was about (dementia!), I initially avoided it, the way I do virtually all movies about death and dementia. It’s not something many of us are eager to relive. Yet when I finally saw it, I found it not only wonderful, but weirdly uplifting. Something about the way Johnson shifts seamlessly from history to memory to imagination, constantly filling the cracks between fiction and non-fiction, allows us the space we need for the magical thinking we require without ever feeling like we’re lying to ourselves.

It’s a hell of a trick, but it’s one Kirsten Johnson may be uniquely suited for. Growing up in a family of Seventh-day Adventists who were always convinced the apocalypse was about to start, she says thought a lot about the future. And unlike Catholicism, Johnson says, Adventism didn’t have a tradition of visual expression for their ideas about Jesus and Mary and Heaven. Which in some way made her do the work on her own, developing what she calls an “intense visual curiosity.”

She’s put that into practice over the past decades as a prolific documentary cinematographer, though in the process worried that she wouldn’t be able to have a family. She eventually had one, with the help of an egg donor and a gay couple she now co-parents with. I spoke with Johnson this week, about how her dad is doing these days, some of the scenes she wanted to shoot but couldn’t, and trying not to compare your kids’ childhoods to you own.


I see you’ve got a special background — or is that in the picture? [Johnson moves the picture around so I can see that it’s a printed picture of her father’s face attached to a popsicle-stick thing]

It’s a Dick on a stick. Dad is here… it’s so crazy, I’m in the middle of moving his room out, and those are literally my mom’s ashes behind me. They’re the best Zoom background ever.

Were you moving him there or…

Dad is now in a dementia care facility. He has been here with me [in New York] for the last three and a half years, where the film is set. But now he’s down in D.C. So we’re moving these shelves out in a little bit. Box of ashes is the last thing on the shelves.

Was there a turning point or something that made you decide you needed to move him there?

Certainly COVID. Honestly, probably in September of last year, it was pretty clear to me I wasn’t going to be able to keep him home with me much longer because he was waking up so much in the middle of the night that I was not getting proper sleep. And I was starting to have heart palpitations because I was so stressed by the lack of sleep, but I was totally unable to conceive of moving him. Then when the pandemic started, I was traveling, so my brother came up and took him down to live with him in D.C. And it’s just been beautiful for the two of them to have a chance to get to live together and also for my brother to understand how challenging it is to be with dementia on a 24-hour basis. He and his wife together were able to have the lucidity to say, none of us can do this anymore because my dad’s very much himself as he is in the movie, and yet he has no sense of time. So it’s like he can wake up in the middle of the night every hour and you have to wake up with him or else he’ll be out the door. You have to be able to function 24 hours a day as a human being taking care of him, so he needs multiple people to be able to work all of his time shifts, basically.

How does he like it?

The place is fantastic. He likes it. He likes the food and the people, but it was wrenching to put him in. I went down to visit him for the first time about a month ago on his birthday, and he was just like, “please take me home.” I was like, oh, you’re killing me, man. So it’s hard.

I assume he can’t remember all the reasons that he’s there in the first place every time he wants out, right?

That’s right. I think he does forget that he has anywhere to go or that I could come get him, but then me being there, he was like, ‘The car’s right here. Why aren’t we leaving?’

This is one of my things about the film: it’s an ongoing process. It’s not finished yet in any kind of way.

Can you tell me about your upbringing with your father? What it was like, where you guys lived, what kind of childhood was it?

I had an extraordinary childhood. I had two very loving parents. We lived in a wonderful neighborhood called Beaux Arts Village in Washington State. It’s a community that shares a lakefront together. So I grew up in the big trees near a lake, and my parents were both raised as Seventh-day Adventists and that was their entire world in many ways. We went to church every Saturday, but the neighborhood we lived in and the neighborhood kids weren’t Seventh-day Adventists. So I sort of had two worlds, but I went to a Seventh-day Adventist school. At that time, Adventists thought the apocalypse was coming. We may think the apocalypse is coming now, but in some ways you can say the apocalypse has been coming for a long time and it hasn’t happened yet. I thought a lot about the future as a child. I didn’t feel worried because I had a really wonderful world I was a part of, but I thought a lot about Heaven. I had a brother who was really interested in fossils. Traditional Adventists believe that the world is 6,000 years old, but my brother found fossils that were 32 million years old, and my parents accepted that.

In the same way that movies were… now Seventh-day Adventists will watch movies. In fact, thrillingly, there were reviews of [Dick Johnson Is Dead] in the Adventist Today and Spectrum Magazine, which are these Adventists magazines, but at the time of my childhood, that was verboten territory. But I watched TV and I had a life of imagination for sure.

Then with your kids, what will their upbringing be like, will it be a lot different than yours?

What a wonderful question. Their upbringing is radically different than mine because they’re in a radically different period of history. They are also not my biological children. They were born with an egg donor. I am co-parenting with two gay men, Ira Sachs and Boris Torres. We live next door to each other in New York City. The kids go back and forth between the two households, so they have three very different backgrounds. But this year with COVID, we ended up being in a borrowed house of a friend up in Connecticut and I had this constant feeling of returning to my own childhood with them. We were going swimming in the lakes, we were going bike riding — all the things we never do in New York City. I thought a lot about how, in some ways grieving never ends, but people never die. My mom’s presence, my dad’s presence was so with me this summer with the kids out in this landscape, that was like the landscape of my childhood.

What was that decision process with the co-parenting and everything?

Well, it’s literally just this mind-blowing story. Basically, I was traveling, filming a great deal throughout my thirties when my mom had Alzheimer’s and I always imagined I was going to have children, but I really was so emotionally connected to my mom during that period, I was sort of aging with her in some ways, losing my own memory along with her.

I was also filming in some incredibly intense situations, in Darfur, Liberia, and Afghanistan, and it was getting more and more difficult for me to remember where I had just filmed. I think that’s a protective mechanism for my brain, given how intense and difficult the situations were. Cameraperson is very much about this, but I got back from weeks and weeks of filming in Sudan and my mother died the next day after I got back. I wasn’t with her. I was so unprepared for her death, even though I had been grieving her loss for almost a decade because of the Alzheimer’s. I just got this knowledge. I was like, “Oh, I am having children.”

It was just that clear, and I’ve never had that happen to me in my life, something hitting me like a bolt of lightning. I was dating a guy at the time and I said, you know, hey, can we have some kids? And he was just like, “What are you talking about? You’ve been in Sudan for five weeks.” And he and I really loved each other, but he really didn’t want to have children. Of course, he has children now. This thing of what people don’t know about themselves yet…

So we finally broke up and I started looking into possibilities that I didn’t feel comfortable with. As an older woman without financial stability, the adoption agencies weren’t very into me. I looked into sperm donors and I searched for several years. Then I was at a Sundance party talking to a friend and this fellow filmmaker who I’d met once before was walking by and overheard me talking about, what am I going to do? And he said, “Oh, me and my boyfriend are really interested in having kids. Do you want to get together and talk about it?”

I said, yes, because I knew I had never wanted to do it by myself. I didn’t want the children to not have a father. I didn’t imagine that I wanted them to have two fathers, but it was an amazing process. It took us three and a half years of trying, and at a certain point, it was definitely like, I’m too old. I sort of said to them, you should really try to do it with someone else. And they were like, well, uh-oh, we really want you to be the mom now. So that’s when we decided to go with the egg donor idea. We implanted two eggs because we didn’t think that anything would work, and two weeks later I was pregnant with a boy and a girl and the children are now eight years old.

Part of the catharsis of watching this movie, I feel, is that it’s you’re giving your dad the sendoff that we all wish that we could. Do you feel like, having a mom that had Alzheimer’s, that you’re doing some of the things with your dad that you’d wished you’d done with your mom?

Oh, definitely. And you talk about the sendoff — we did a great job for my mom’s funeral. She would’ve loved it. She was one of those people who put on a good party, set an amazing table… she really knew how to give a good send-off. And I just remember the feeling after the funeral, she doesn’t get to see everything we did and I don’t get to hug her. So in some ways, I would say the funeral was as much for me as it was for my father. I really wanted to hug my father after his funeral, and I got to.

Are there important things that you learned from your mom’s passing? When my grandmother died of Alzheimer’s, I remember hearing that you’re not supposed to quiz people on who they recognize and what they remember because it’s traumatizing for them. And so there were all these things that I did that I learned afterwards were supposedly bad things to do, but how could I know at the time? Do you feel like you get a second chance to do things differently or better or having more knowledge now?

That’s so interesting that you were told that. I’m not sure that that was right. I think how cool that you were having a dialogue with her. How did she respond?

She just always seemed confused. She had a much steeper decline than it seems like what your dad has. It was pretty fast actually. Once we found out it all sort of went at once. She lost her personality pretty early on I would say.

That’s what’s just so devastating, the loss of personality. When people become mean, are so afraid or so anxious. That’s the thing I think that’s extraordinary about my father’s situation, he’s not losing his personality. He doesn’t know where he is or what the time is, but he will say, “I just want to make sure you know I love you.” It’s just like, oh my God, amazing. But also challenging to hear that 7,000 times a day. But I’m deeply interested in the fact that this world is so much more complex than we can ever understand. That we each have these deep blind spots. That we cannot know certain things until we’ve experienced them. So I can’t know what I will feel upon the death of my father, even though I’ve practiced a million times now.

That was the project of this film was to stay engaged in the not knowing. So not only did I learn something, this movie was set up so it would teach us how to make it. I was saying to all my wonderful collaborators, how do you want to die?

So you laughed when I said, how do you want to die? How do you want to die, Vince?

Great question. I don’t know. It’s hard to know whether you want to have the instant one or the one where you get to say goodbye first. They both seem good and bad in their own ways.

That is the crux of it, isn’t it? Nicely said. Yeah, that is hard to know.

I don’t. I’ve seen it both ways and I don’t know which one’s better, so…

Right. And I think one of our challenges is why we’re in denial about death is some of us have seen it worse, right? We’ve seen the worst possible outcomes, or we’ve already experienced pain that’s so intense that we’re just like, “No, thank you, not thinking about that.” Or I can think about it in a movie, but I can’t think about it in real life — which is what we were trying to mess with in this film.

Exactly. So with all the death scenarios that you’re dreaming up in the movie, were there ones that you wanted to do that were more complicated or that you couldn’t film for whatever reason?

Oh, yes. I really wanted to put my dad out on an ice floe. I really did. I wanted to set him on fire. And it’s just classic filmmaking. Like, oh, we don’t have enough money to do that. Well, this time I got enough money to do it and then our protagonist can no longer do the things that I wish him to be able to do, which is just this profound metaphor for the whole project. That it’s already too late for me to push him out on an ice floe by himself.

The funeral that happened in Seattle, did you dream that whole thing up or what were the circumstances?

I sure did. I literally dreamed it up. I had a dream that I saw my dad in an open casket, and he sat up and said, “I’m Dick Johnson. I’m not dead yet.” And that immediately gave me this idea of, we could do this funeral while he was alive. It meant reaching out to the pastor of our church, reaching out to this whole community of people who’ve known me all of my life, and known my father all of their life. We did a multi-camera shoot. We had five different cameras. I had initially imagined wanting to have my dad in the open casket upfront, but my brother was like, “Over my dead body.” And he was right. It would have been a terrible idea because people wouldn’t have been able to go there emotionally.

What we did was, they experienced it as if he was dead. They arrived at the church. He was not there. I was there greeting them. They knew he was alive, but he wasn’t there. And they also knew he had dementia, so they also knew they were losing him. I’d asked everyone to speak in the past tense. Everyone but my brother did that. My brother was resisting all the way and now he’s a fan. To do the funeral was just an extraordinary gift for everyone I believe because everyone got to see him again at the end of really going through his funeral.

What was actually in the casket during that?

So dad was in the casket, but the casket was green-screened onto the stage.

Then the guy that was really crying, did someone comfort him?

That’s such a great question. I wasn’t there. I think if I had been there with a handheld camera, I would have comforted him. I wouldn’t have held that shot. But it was John Foster who was one of the wonderful camera people working that day, and he was on a locked-off camera. I had said to all of the camera people, feel empowered. These are your positions. You’re on a tripod, but film what is meaningful to you to film because I know they know how to do it. That’s what we do.

Similarly, Nadia Hallgren came and took the camera from me when I was standing behind the window with dad. And then she shot that incredible shot of dad walking down the aisle. If I had shot it, I could not be in the moment of the family with him that she spun around and there we all were together. So there are these impossibilities of me doing everything.

That’s what I think this film affirms, that we must do these things together. We must make multiple attempts. You don’t just have one conversation about someone’s dying. You have multiple conversations and if we try to do it all together with some kind of love, it might make it sustain.

‘Dick Johnson Is Dead’ is available now on Netflix. Vince Mancini is on Twitter. You can access his archive of reviews here.

Categories
News Trending Viral Worldwide

‘The Queen’s Gambit’ Has No Business Making A Chess Drama This Interesting

Plenty of debate exists about whether chess should be classified as a sport. Dozens of countries have hopped aboard the “yes” train. A few countries are even attempting to push chess into the 2024 Olympics, and good for them. I’m not here to die on either side of that hill, but I will insist upon one point: while chess is certainly not a contact sport, Anya Taylor-Joy’s piercing gaze could qualify as a lethal weapon against opponents. As fictional chess prodigy Beth Harmon in Netflix’s The Queen’s Gambit, Taylor-Joy is every bit of the powerhouse that one would expect from an actress who landed the Furiosa prequel role. Every steely stare and turn of her head, and each lowering of her eyes and crossing of arms — it’s all in the furtherance of battle. And she’s good, damn good.

Little doubt existed, for anyone who’s watched Taylor-Joy in The Witch, Split, or any of her rapidly accumulating credits, that she’s got presence, but The Queen’s Gambit makes exquisite and methodical use of her talents. And like any chess grandmaster, Taylor-Joy’s biggest strengths lie not within the moves themselves but in transitions between game stages, including calculations that no one can see. Her performance here is like a choreographed (yet grueling) dance, even when she’s sitting perfectly still or reclining upon various pieces of furniture. She does that a great deal over the course of the season, but somehow, she’s utterly riveting during every onscreen moment.

Somehow, as well, this chess-drama is a lot more interesting than it has any right to be.

Netflix

Much of the series’ success has to do with the “chess” aspect of the story acting as a sumptuous cloak for multiple universal themes. Chief among those elements would be the underdog tale, which we don’t often see outside of the contact-sport context. Speaking of which, it feels necessary to point out the common ground between The Queen’s Gambit and another recent Netflix arrival, Cobra Kai. Not only are both the best at making us root for the underdog characters, but each show made me root for projects that weren’t necessarily expected to ride high. Be honest — how many people really believed a The Karate Kid revival would fare so much better than most revivals or reboots? The same question could be asked for a story about chess.

Look at me, mentioning a karate-focused franchise in the same breath as one that revolves around a strategy-focused board game. Yet both stories appeal to a similar audience. Both shows carry the same level of emotional gravity, and The Queen’s Gambit steps up as a dramatic and suspenseful and, yes, unexpectedly intense show.

Beth Harmon lives and dies by the fall of the pawns (and rooks and queens) on her opponents’ boards. Even more telling is the presence of Godless director Scott Frank, who’s co-creating, showrunning, directing, writing, and executive producing. If that wasn’t promising enough, consider that The Queen’s Gambit novel, which was published in 1983, was committed to the page by Walter Tevis, who also happened to pen 1959’s The Hustler novel, which led to the 1961 movie (starring Paul Newman) of the same name. What’s truly sobering is that The Queen’s Gambit has been destined for adaptation for over a decade, including a version meant to star Ellen Page and Heath Ledger.

Ledger’s posthumous-Oscar-winning clout lends gravity to anything that he was even tangentially attached to when he died, and even moreso considering the tragic dynamics of The Queen’s Gambit. Beth’s orphan-plight sources from a great trauma, in which her mathematically-inclined mother perished. As a child, she’s stuck in a tranquilizer-fueled orphanage and finds purpose and drive from chess when an orderly (Bill Camp) recognizes her budding genius. She’s adopted by a fellow lost soul, a 1950s housewife played by Marielle Heller with tragic alcoholism on the side but genuine love and respect at the center of the relationship. Yet Beth comes by her own addictive tendencies honestly, and the show’s lush set pieces and glamorous wardrobe turns (both of which are often Mad Men-esque) dovetail seamlessly with the debauchery of it all.

Netflix

You never thought chess could be steamy, right? Well, it is, but not gratuitously so. The show resists labels, and furthermore, this is Taylor-Joy’s vehicle, and she commands it, but there are other actor-ly attractions on display. It’s tempting to say that Beth is aided in her journey by multiple influential players in her life. That would be incorrect. Rather, she’s enriched by them. That would include Moses Ingram as Jolene, one of Beth’s companions from her orphanage days. And she’s periodically surrounded by fellow chess prodigies who, one by one, end up falling to her prowess while also doing double-duty as potential suitors. Among them are Harry Melling’s Harry and, most delightfully, Thomas Brodie-Sangster as Benny, whose costumed affectations come closest to matching up to Beth’s eccentricities. Their speed-chess scene is a standout one.

Netflix

There’s plenty else going on in this series, of course, including Beth’s adventures from Kentucky to Mexico and Vegas and Russia, with a smorgasbord of wander-junkie visuals on hand. One could also be persuaded to call this a coming-of-age tale, but that’s only the framing of Beth’s travels. Or you can consider this a meditation upon addiction and danger. More than any of those labels, however, The Queen’s Gambit zeroes in on what it costs to become a champion. Sacrifices must be made, and tragedy and trauma prevail during moments, but it’s ultimately an invigorating and thrilling story.

Besides those creature comforts, The Queen’s Gambit manages to nail its tight pacing for a strategically planned seven episodes. The odd number there is telling. It’s always 8, 10, or 12 episodes on streaming, you know? Seven is weird, but it’s spot-on for this story. No more and no less than necessary, and that’s a rarity in the digital age.

Everyone here — Scott Frank, the screenwriters, the costume and set designers, and (obviously) the talent — is on their game, quite like (and at the service of) Beth. She’s irrevocably and, at the same time, admirably and terrifyingly, focused upon winning a world title. That singular goal comes at the expense of relationships and relaxing downtime that most people covet and cherish. Along the way, she experiences fleeting connections and meaningful ones, and some do stick. Yet her focus, for better or worse, is to overcome being known as a standout for being a female champion amid a male-dominated, competitive subculture. She’d rather become a flat-out champion without mention of gender. The show, in reaching that goal, is a success. More than that, The Queen’s Gambit is a remarkably intense bingewatch.

Netflix’s ‘The Queen’s Gambit’ streams on Friday, October 23rd.

Categories
News Trending Viral Worldwide

Ice Cube Declares He’s ‘Not Supporting Donald Trump’ But Is Still An ‘Undecided Voter’

In recent days, Ice Cube has dealt with backlash after the public learned that he worked with the Trump administration on a Black outreach program. This has led to the inevitable speculation that he has become a Donald Trump supporter, and now he has clarified his stance on that front.

Ice Cube sat down for an interview with Hot 97, and during the chat, he declared, “I’m not supporting Donald Trump.” That was in response to an Ebro question about potentially being put off by “the white supremacy alignment of Donald Trump and the people he has working for him who are overt white supremacists.” Ice Cube continued, “White supremacy do turn me off, but it’s everywhere and it’s on both sides of the aisle. That’s just the reality that we live in, and I’m not naive to that. We’re engulfed in white supremacy, so that’s just something we’re going to have to fight our way out of, and we’re going to have to fight on all fronts.”

He also said that the Democratic party doesn’t automatically have his vote. Although he has voted for a Democratic candidate in every election, he insisted he’s still an undecided voter, saying, “I actually haven’t. I’m going to vote because there are a lot of things to vote for in California up and down, our city and state. I’m a real true undecided voter, because they’re not doing enough.”

Watch the full conversation above.

Categories
News Trending Viral Worldwide

Jennifer Lawrence Considered Herself A ‘Little Republican’ Until Trump Was Elected President

Jennifer Lawrence was born and raised in Kentucky, a “Red” state that no Democrat running for president has won since Bill Clinton in 1996. So, it’s no surprise that the first time she voted for president, “I voted for John McCain. I was a little Republican,” the Oscar winner said on the Absolutely Not podcast. Her upbringing in the Bluegrass State showed her the “fiscal benefits of some of the Republican policies,” even if the party’s “social issues weren’t in line with [her] views.” But her beliefs have shifted since Donald Trump was elected.

“That just changed everything,” Lawrence admitted, adding, “This is an impeached president who’s broken many laws and has refused to condemn white supremacy, and it feels like there has been a line drawn in the sand. I don’t think it’s right. It just changes things for me. I don’t want to support a president who supports white supremacists”:

Lawrence went on to compare the Trump presidency to Barack Obama’s, saying that she remembered a time when Obama would go for long periods without making headlines, because things were so stable and certain. People would “go days, maybe weeks, without thinking about the president because everything would generally be OK,” she said.

Lawrence recently endorsed Joe Biden for president, “because Donald Trump has and will continue to put himself before the safety and well-being of America. He does not represent my values as an American, and most importantly as a human being.” Trump has a 57 percent chance of winning Kentucky, according to FiveThirtyEight.

(Via InStyle)

Categories
News Trending Viral Worldwide

Bill Murray Almost Carries ‘On The Rocks,’ Sofia Coppola’s Tale Of Rich People Behaving Blandly

From the earliest days of her directorial career, Sofia Coppola has focused mainly on rich people problems. And why shouldn’t she? Her name is Coppola, synonymous with inherited power in the entertainment industry, where 40-50% of our famous people seem to be the descendants of other famous people these days (even if most don’t wear their lineage as conspicuously as she does).

Besides writing what she knows (and surely it’s better she dissect her own milieu than do the whole sadness porn/poverty tourism thing) there’s an obvious draw to rich-people-problems narratives — as perhaps best exemplified by Succession: rich characters simply have the means to get weirder. What’s better than watching a macabre squabble over the levers of power?

Yet in Sofia Coppola’s latest, starring Rashida Jones on a quest to uncover her husband’s affairs with the help of her womanizing playboy father played by Bill Murray, rich people paint themselves into whimsical situations, in which they act… disappointingly rational. Their wealth manifests mostly as tasteful window dressing and the ability to surmount normal barriers to spouse stalking. Stalking that, while whimsical and mostly charming in a Bill-Murray-making-conversation kind of way, uncovers nary a Nazi orgy or Satanic bunga bunga party. What kind of dull-ass rich people are these? Bore on the floor, I say.

Coppola seems to want it both ways. Laura (Rashida Jones) lives in a tastefully-appointed New York apartment with her two young kids, with a husband, Dean (Marlon Wayans) who’s some kind of techy mover and shaker. He brags about reaching 500K followers to his unnamed company’s social media account, and about working with A24 — a tacky name drop of On The Rocks‘ own distributor, though admittedly an accurate jab at NYC media culture. Laura, meanwhile, is some kind of writer, established enough to have her own office to write in, complete with a big window (eat your heart out, Virginia Woolf), though naturally she’s in the midst of a bout of writer’s block. “I’m never going to sell a book before I’ve written it again,” she sighs to a friend over the phone.

The door to Laura and Dean’s apartment has Bernie Sanders and Stacey Abrams stickers on the inside, and what to make of these? In the absence of any other kind of even mildly political statements or juxtapositions in the movie, they seem little more than a filmmaker’s attempt to build rapport with her audience. How do you do, fellow progressives?

Coppola is on surer footing in her depiction of hetero-monogamy, clearly the real reason we’re here. She opens with Laura catching a clip of an old Chris Rock bit. “If you like f*ckin’, don’t get married. Shit, I haven’t f*cked in seven years. I’ve had intercourse…”

In a way, it’s a succinct expression of the entire movie that follows. One night, Dean (as much as I’ve always thought of Marlon as the least funny Wayans brother I enjoy his brief dramatic roles) starts to initiate foreplay with Laura while half asleep. Oddly, he seems to react with surprise and disappointment when he realizes it’s her. This incident, combined with Dean spending so much time at work (and traveling with a young new colleague) are enough for Laura to suspect that Dean is cheating. When she confides in her wealthy art dealer father, Felix (Bill Murray) who has his own driver and a collection of tasteful scarves, he’s only too happy to assist and advise Laura in her detective work. “You gotta get ahead of this,” he counsels, arguing that it’s better to catch in the act than confront.

Much of the ensuing movie consists of Rashida Jones and Bill Murray doing quirky detective work at resorts, in the cockpit of convertibles, and at weird house parties for old rich art collectors, as Murray’s character flirts with every woman he sees and explains why men are biologically incapable of monogamy. Murray is enjoyable as always, playing a charismatic incorrigible in the classic Murray mold. Jones is adequate, given a much less fun character to work with.

Laura’s father’s womanizing and general views on biological determinism are meant to deepen the character drama unfolding around them, but mostly they function as a reductive explanation. Of course the woman who was raised by an ogler like Bill Murray has married a man she can’t trust. Of course the woman whose parents split up over infidelity has infidelity issues. The mystery seems to solve itself. Why are we here again?

Narratively, On The Rocks is a bit like Lost In Translation with an Elektra complex (well, more of an Elektra complex, anyway). Most of the fun comes from watching Jones and Murray bounce from posh restaurant to sumptuous loft in their Quixotic quest to catch Dean in the act. Murray charms and there are times it gets enjoyably weird, but mostly it lacks the truly peculiar situations and sexual tension that made Lost In Translation sing (which is to say that people actually misbehaved in it). On The Rocks is enjoyable enough while it lasts, with likeable characters and mildly funny dialogue, but without some kind of reveal or reversal or perversion it feels a bit like Lost In Translation with the volume turned down.

Back in the early aughts, Entourage promised us a peek behind the curtain of fame and fortune, only for us to discover that rich people’s drama was apparently just a duller, lower-stakes version of our own (Will Vince do the movie? Will E finally make up with Sloan?). On The Rocks is cleverer than that, with much better acting and nicer sets, but they both end up raising the same existential question: if rich characters can’t even be bothered to be debauched or perverse, what good are they?

‘On The Rocks’ will begin streaming October 23rd on Apple+. Vince Mancini is on Twitter. You can access his archive of reviews here.

Categories
News Trending Viral Worldwide

A Fan Caught A Home Run And Then Bizarrely Threw His Glove On The Field

Game 2 of the World Series saw the Tampa Bay Rays even the series at 1-1 with the Los Angeles Dodgers in a 6-4 win as they bounced back from a lopsided loss in the opener.

As has been the case all postseason, the long ball played a big role in Game 2, with Tampa getting a pair of home runs from Brandon Lowe in the win, driving three of their six runs, and all four L.A. runs coming off of four home runs. The second of the Dodgers homers was off the bat of Will Smith as he drove the ball into the seats in left center. As was the case in the NLCS, there are a limited number of fans in the stands for the World Series and one of those fans came prepared with his glove and made quite the snag over his head.

However, what happened from there was one of the more bizarre sequences that led Joe Buck to deliver a perfect call of “what?” as the fan…chucked his glove onto the field for reasons passing understanding.

Throwing the ball back is a long held tradition of fans when they catch a home run of the opposition, but throwing the glove is a new one. I guess the glove had, at that point, done it’s job and brought him in a baseball and as such he had no need for it anymore, but there’s no rule that you have to pick one or the other.

Categories
News Trending Viral Worldwide

Jeezy Calls Out T.I. For ‘Avoiding’ Him During His Search For A Verzuz Competitor

T.I. has spent the last few months searching for an artist to join him for a Verzuz competition. His search began with a call-out to 50 Cent on his birthday in July. “Pull your ass up with 20 of your records, sit across from me, and get this work, man,” T.I. said in a video to Instagram. The challenge got 50’s attention but failed to produce the battle that T.I. hoped for. Recently, he received a challenge from Busta Rhymes, but the ATL rapper declined the offer due to a “generation gap.” However, in his response to Busta Rhymes, T.I. mentioned a battle with Jeezy saying, “Incredible amount of Young and his catalog. Personal patna of mine. But if Young wanted this smoke, he’d say it.”

Catching wind of T.I.’s comments, Jeezy quickly offered a response on Instagram that found the fellow ATLien confidently accepting the challenge. “Say bruh. You done been around the whole world on your campaign. Now you back here,” Jeezy said. “I don’t know what you avoiding me for. I’ll tell you what though, since it mean that much to you, put a date on it. I ain’t gon’ meet you there, I’m gon’ beat you there. Straight up. Big Snow.”

T.I. hopped in the comments of the video and said, “Hmmm could this long time constituent of mine be referring to me???” In addition to T.I.’s response, Swizz Beatz, the co-founder of Verzuz, left a string of eye emojis to possibly tease the idea of their battle becoming a reality.

You can watch Jeezy’s response in the video above.

Categories
News Trending Viral Worldwide

ASAP Ferg Declares ‘There’s No Breaking Up’ The ASAP Mob Following His Rift With The Group

Last month, ASAP Illz, one of ASAP Mob’s founding fathers, made the surprising announcement that ASAP Ferg was no longer apart of the group. Illz posted the announcement to his Instagram page saying, “That n**** burnt out, songs dumb trash mr anthem cant get right.” Despite Illz’s claim, ASAP Nast stepped forward and said that Ferg was still a part of the group. Until this point, Ferg’s responses to Illz’s claims came in the form of an indirect video and a pair of lines from “Big ASAP” from his Floor Seats II project. In a recent interview with Genius, the Harlem rapper opened up about the situation and refused to entertain any idea of the Mob breaking up.

“That could go without being said. You can’t kick me out of something I helped build,” Ferg said. “I brought millions and millions of dollars and fed families through my voice and my ideas … I bring equity into the brand. I mean, that’s like the carpenter. You can’t kick the carpenter out and expect for the house to have a roof.” He went on to explain that entering the Mob is a lifetime commitment and not something that can be taken away at any given point.

“I don’t think there’s no breaking up of the Mob. It’s like, once you’re in the Mob, you can’t get out,” he said. “This is blood in, blood out […] The different families, they war with each other and sh*t, because one mob member leave and then they build they own sh*t and then it becomes a thing. But you can never get out of the mob. So that’s not even a thing.”

You can watch the full interview above.

Categories
News Trending Viral Worldwide

The New Electric Hummer Takes LeBron Back To His Infamous H2

It’s hard to remember a time when LeBron James wasn’t a world famous athlete with hundreds of millions of dollars in his bank account and endorsement deals galore. But you can bet that LeBron still remembers. Those early struggles during his formative years in Northeast Ohio have had a tremendous influence on who he is as a person.

That’s why one of his more recent endorsements has brought back some of those old memories. During his senior year at St. Vincent/St. Mary’s, LeBron made waves when he arrived on the scene in a brand new Hummer H2 that was a gift from his mother Gloria for his 18th birthday.

Now, LeBron has come full circle as the voice for GMC’s all-electric Hummer EV.

Back in 2003, it caused all sorts of hand-wringing and self-righteous posturing from those who chaffed at the notion of an 18-year-old driving such an ostentatious vehicle. Even worse, it prompted an investigation from the Ohio High School Athletics Association, which had rules in place against athletes receiving gifts worth more than $100.

The OHSAA eventually ruled that the gift was okay, given that his mother had taken out a loan to make the purchase, but it ignited a debate about the ongoing controversy about whether high school and college athletes should be allowed to earn money from their craft, with public sentiment increasingly siding with the athletes over the years, so many of whom come from low-income backgrounds.

It’s an idea that the ad cleverly calls back to with LeBron’s opening lines: “The real revolutionaries…are the ones that change the game forever.” Nearly 20 years later, the debate rages on, and LeBron’s latest endorsement is reminder of just how far he’s come, but also how much work there’s still left to do.